sent from a phone
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 19:13, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> "no overtaking" is too broad IMHO.
maybe we'd have to define what "overtaking" means, in contrast to e.g. "passing
an obstacle" (e.g. slow moving tractor). If overtaking is broad or not is not
completely clear currently, b
On 2016-12-08 09:36, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 03:09, André Pirard wrote:
>> On 2016-12-07 22:53, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Apparently there are roads that have an 'ongoing' U-turn
>>> restriction, see the sign here for
>>> example: http://openstreetcam.org/details/1
On 2016-12-08 15:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 12:25, Colin Smale wrote:
>
>> Martin, your interpretation is jurisdiction-dependant. There is sometimes a
>> distinction between single and double lines as well (Queensland is an
>> example I just found). The objectively ver
On 12/8/16 9:34 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Also, for what it's worth, in massachusetts.us, we have two kinds of
> solid yellow (center) lines. One can pass with care give a single line,
> but may not cross the line or pass if double.
many states post explicit "no passing" signs at the beginning of s
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 8 Dec 2016, at 12:25, Colin Smale wrote:
>>
>> Martin, your interpretation is jurisdiction-dependant. There is
>> sometimes a distinction between single and double lines as well
>> (Queensland is an example I just found). The objectively
sent from a phone
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 12:25, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> Martin, your interpretation is jurisdiction-dependant. There is sometimes a
> distinction between single and double lines as well (Queensland is an example
> I just found). The objectively verifiable fact is the road marking
On 07/12/2016 22:48, LeTopographeFou wrote:
Hi,
I will probably reopen an explosive case but I would like to know
where we are reguarding shop=estate_agent vs office=estate_agent.
Personally I use both - "shop" for places that are primarily B2C and
fitted out as shops, and "office" for pl
2016-12-08 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> > On 8 Dec 2016, at 01:49, Mike N wrote:
> >
> > Like all things in OSM, I'm not sure how to migrate to a new consensus
> of office=
>
>
> just use office, and add a hint to the wiki. As was pointed out above,
> actual migration has already taken
Martin, your interpretation is jurisdiction-dependant. There is
sometimes a distinction between single and double lines as well
(Queensland is an example I just found). The objectively verifiable fact
is the road marking, thereafter you have to interpret the local laws to
understand its effect. A n
sent from a phone
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 09:36, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> how we tag, on two-way roads, continuous middle lines (or double continuous
> middle lines) that imply continuous stretches of road with "no-u-turn", no
> passing/overtaking, and "no-left-turn" (in countries with right-ha
sent from a phone
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 01:49, Mike N wrote:
>
> Like all things in OSM, I'm not sure how to migrate to a new consensus of
> office=
just use office, and add a hint to the wiki. As was pointed out above, actual
migration has already taken place, given the usage numbers and su
sent from a phone
On 8 Dec 2016, at 02:15, Alejandro S. wrote:
>> Some are indeed better tagged with amenity=cafe
>
>
>
>
> And maybe some of them as amenity=pub?
maybe in very few exceptions, usually not. There are pubs in Italy and they are
completely different from bars. Pubs also ha
This is interesting and closely related to the question how we tag, on
two-way roads, continuous middle lines (or double continuous middle lines)
that imply continuous stretches of road with "no-u-turn", no
passing/overtaking, and "no-left-turn" (in countries with right-hand
traffic).
In addition t
13 matches
Mail list logo