sent from a phone
> On 7. Apr 2017, at 23:41, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> I think the conclusion was to keep landuse=forest and the dicussion forked
> into subtagging of crops.
you can distinguish different states also with "landcover"
cheers,
Martin
_
There was a longer discussion about this topic in January this year already:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/thread.html
I think the conclusion was to keep landuse=forest and the dicussion forked into
subtagging of crops.
On 07.04.2017 20:56, Mattias Dalkvist wrot
On 08-Apr-17 04:56 AM, Mattias Dalkvist wrote:
Hi
What are the options for tagging forest areas that have been
harvested/clear cut?
Searching the wiki I found:
landuse=logging many with logging=clearcutting or
logging=selective_cutting or logging:start_date=*
18k uses mostly Eastern Europe
Hi
What are the options for tagging forest areas that have been
harvested/clear cut?
Searching the wiki I found:
landuse=logging many with logging=clearcutting or logging=selective_cutting
or logging:start_date=*
18k uses mostly Eastern Europe and Russia
man_made=clearcut almost all with natur
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> On 06-Apr-17 04:09 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have a scheme for tagging such a beast?
>>>
>>
> You can combine turn:lanes [1] with change:lanes [2], the first describe
> which lane you have to use for which turn, the second where you c
+ 1 with Stephan
The name= tag should be the local language.
If there is no local language then there should be no name= tag, to do
other wise implies the local language is that of the named value. /
/On 07-Apr-17 04:05 PM, Vao Matua wrote:
I would suggest that in addition to the specific lang
sent from a phone
> On 7. Apr 2017, at 02:28, Stephan Knauss wrote:
>
> Use name:en for English, name:fr for French and so on. No "name" tag.
+1, unless there is someone living there, then it's their language
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing
