Re: [Tagging] Seasonal, intermittent, and ephemeral water tags

On 20/05/18 18:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 19. May 2018 04:33 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : The intermittent tag continues to be confused with seasonal. Possibly this is because some want to use it to indicate that a follow is both seasonal and

Re: [Tagging] tagging arbiters (gone OT)

The case I had in mind was Carto-OSM's claim to require the highest level boundary admin_level tag to be on ways & within relations. I'm unsure I'd describe it as a bug, as they haven't written any code for it yet. Those involved claim this is not possible within Carto-OSM:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

Just as a further data point, we had this discussion in 2016 here http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2016-October/003827.html Am 20.05.2018 um 10:38 schrieb Selfish Seahorse: > On 19 May 2018 at 21:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> route=walking_bus? >>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Walkingbus_stop

On 19 May 2018 at 21:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > route=walking_bus? > that’s duck tagging, simple and concise, and is easy to understand for who > knows the concept. +1 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Seasonal, intermittent, and ephemeral water tags

19. May 2018 04:33 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : > The intermittent tag continues to be confused with seasonal. > > Possibly this is because some want to use it to indicate that a follow is > both seasonal and intermittent? > At least in my case it was like this:

Re: [Tagging] Seasonal, intermittent, and ephemeral water tags

20. May 2018 00:29 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : > Intermittent clarification: > > Clarify the meaning of intermittent on the OSM wiki! At the moment it says > "used to indicate that a body of water does not permanently contain water." > That is too easily confused