[Tagging] Fwd: Tagging Digest, Vol 107, Issue 111

2018-08-26 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Forwarding message that came directly Thanks Graeme -- Forwarded message - From: St Niklaas Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 19:24 Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 107, Issue 111 To: Graeme Fitzpatrick , daveswarth...@gmail.com < daveswarth...@gmail.com> Hi Graham and Dave

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 4:11 PM Dave Swarthout wrote: > >We also have the occasional spot like > >https://orthos.dhses.ny.gov/?Extent=-8283718.624472891,5242597.149663145,-8283317.927238801,5242833.029555047&Layers=2017_cache,2016_cache,2015_cache,2014_cache,2013_cache > >There, we have an extra l

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-26 Thread Dave Swarthout
>We also have the occasional spot like > https://orthos.dhses.ny.gov/?Extent=-8283718.624472891,5242597.149663145,-8283317.927238801,5242833.029555047&Layers=2017_cache,2016_cache,2015_cache,2014_cache,2013_cache >There, we have an extra lane on the northbound side for the purpose of >getting by wh

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-26 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 2:22 PM Paul Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 12:30 Dave Swarthout wrote: >> I agree that those are two different critters and that using the passing >> _place tag is not the best way to handle this. But, aside from splitting the >> highway into lanes:forward, lane

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-08-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 12:30 Dave Swarthout wrote: > I agree that those are two different critters and that using > the passing _place tag is not the best way to handle this. But, aside from > splitting the highway into lanes:forward, lanes:backward, etc., how should > such a turnout be tagged? Th

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-26 Thread Andy Mabbett
"On 26 August 2018 at 14:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> On 26. Aug 2018, at 13:18, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> >> Please tag any Stolperstein that you add to OSM with the equivalent >> Wikidata "QID". > Does Wikidata have an item for every Stolperstein (i.e. where osm could use > the “wikidata”

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26. Aug 2018, at 13:18, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > Please tag any Stolperstein that you add to OSM with the equivalent > Wikidata "QID". Does Wikidata have an item for every Stolperstein (i.e. where osm could use the “wikidata” tag), or which are the tags we use in osm?

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-26 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 26 August 2018 at 12:18, Andy Mabbett wrote: > There is also a project to log Stolpersteine in Wikidata: > >https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Stolpersteine P.S. Of course, this also involves adding a photograph of each individual Stolperstein to Wikimedia Commons, which i

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-26 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 26 August 2018 at 11:46, Peter Elderson wrote: > The organisation for the Stolpersteine project has a website, which says > there will be a central database end of 2018. There is also a project to log Stolpersteine in Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Stolperste

Re: [Tagging] Stolpersteine tagging scheme problem

2018-08-26 Thread Peter Elderson
The organisation for the Stolpersteine project has a website, which says there will be a central database end of 2018. These things tend to drift though... I have send them a friendly email to inquire about the possibilities to use this database in OSM. They coud then use OSM as a display/search to