Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 8:15 PM Dave Swarthout wrote: > @Warin, Thanks for clearing up my confusion about passing places. These > turnouts are definitely not the same. A vehicle should never stop in one. > They are about 1/4 mile long and some but not all have painted lines to > separate the highw

Re: [Tagging] Coastline for rivers, estuaries and mangroves?

Colin and Christoph, could you give some guidance about a couple of the specific situations that I brought up in the original post? First, in the question on the help Q&A board, the other mapper wanted to remove the coastline from tidal parts of rivers in England , so that the end of the waterway=

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

@Warin, Thanks for clearing up my confusion about passing places. These turnouts are definitely not the same. A vehicle should never stop in one. They are about 1/4 mile long and some but not all have painted lines to separate the highway proper from the turnout lanes. In the U.S., where we drive o

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

On 04/09/18 21:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2018-09-04 12:42 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout >: Summarizing recent comments: Martin wrote: > what’s wrong with passing place? Seems to describe the same thing I thought so too until I noticed that the

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

2018-09-04 12:42 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout : > > Summarizing recent comments: > Martin wrote: > > what’s wrong with passing place? Seems to describe the same thing > > I thought so too until I noticed that the Wiki says passing_place is used > for nodes only, using logic that escapes me, so I began

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

Summarizing recent comments: Martin wrote: > what’s wrong with passing place? Seems to describe the same thing I thought so too until I noticed that the Wiki says passing_place is used for nodes only, using logic that escapes me, so I began searching for another method. I also considered modifying

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

sent from a phone > On 4. Sep 2018, at 09:35, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > I'd propose to tag the section of the road with the turnout (or alternatively > just a node) turnout:=yes. what’s wrong with passing place? Seems to describe the same thing Cheers, Martin __

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC: Via ferrata simplified

Hi Den 09/03/2018 kl. 02:53 PM, skrev Richard: On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 01:25:45PM +0200, egil wrote: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Via_ferrata_simplified please not a completely new utterly incompatible with everything else proposal. Many elements of the old proposal a

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

I would use both lanes=x+1 (where x is the number of lanes without turnout section) and something like turnout:lanes=no|no|yes|yes (if there are 2 turn out lanes) and lanes:turnout=1 (or 2, or 3) this is similar to tagging deficated bus lanes On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:37 AM SelfishSeahorse wrote

Re: [Tagging] Tagging suggestions for electricity

Le lun. 3 sept. 2018 à 23:52, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > While it is good to encourage the discussion of a tag on the tagging list, > trying to make a mapper do a proposal page is a discouragement to enter > into discussions on the tagging list - the last thing 'we' want! > The onl

Re: [Tagging] Slow vehicle turnouts

Hi! I'd propose to tag the section of the road with the turnout (or alternatively just a node) turnout:=yes. I would neither use a lane key nor a separate highway=service way, because slow vehicle turnouts aren't lanes for moving traffic and because a separate highway way would give the wrong imp