[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

One of the commenters has suggested an additional tag indicating what services a consulate or embassy provides, and that is one option.  Not all consulates or consular sections of embassies offer all visa types, for example.  The existent service=* tag could possibly be used.  For example, one

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

The Holy See is sovereign, so its nunciatures are embassies by another name. On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:20 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Umm .. here is some sort of exception. > > "Apostolic Nunciature of The Holy See" ... :-) > > > Ok .. what is it (in OSM terms)? Presently in the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

Umm .. here is some sort of exception. "Apostolic Nunciature of The Holy See" ... :-) Ok .. what is it (in OSM terms)? Presently in the data base as amenity=embassy ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Out of the bars and onto the map: An lgbtq:*=* tagging scheme?

sent from a phone > On 23. Oct 2018, at 20:27, Rory McCann wrote: > > There is an existing "gay" tag[1], which is used 650 times[2]. But it's > a little restrictive. And it also suggested "gay:transgender=yes" which > is just plain wrong. > So to start off, I'm suggest a simple "lgbtq=yes"

Re: [Tagging] [Diversity-talk] Out of the bars and onto the map: An lgbtq:*=* tagging scheme?

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 19:27, Rory McCann wrote: > "shop=books lgbtq=yes" is a LGBTQ book shop, Wouldn't that be "shop=books books=lgbtq"? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On 2018-10-23 23:15, Paul Allen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:21 PM Colin Smale wrote: > >> What's your point, Paul? > > That there are distinctions between embassies and consulates. And now back to the discussion in hand An embassy must be tagged/taggable to indicate whether it

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:21 PM Colin Smale wrote: What's your point, Paul? > That there are distinctions between embassies and consulates. And that some of us are old enough to remember them. And that that those memories are repeatedly triggered by every post in this thread. And that I have

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On 2018-10-23 20:50, Paul Allen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:18 PM Colin Smale wrote: > >> I know this is a big generalisation, but I hope you will agree there is an >> important difference. > > An even bigger difference is that Consulate have a menthol filter but Embassy > have a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:18 PM Colin Smale wrote: I know this is a big generalisation, but I hope you will agree there is an > important difference. > An even bigger difference is that Consulate have a menthol filter but Embassy have a plain filter. I don't recall ever seeing a brand of

[Tagging] Out of the bars and onto the map: An lgbtq:*=* tagging scheme?

Hi all, I'd like to improve the state of mapping/tagging for LGBTQ topics, and I'd like feedback. There is an existing "gay" tag[1], which is used 650 times[2]. But it's a little restrictive. And it also suggested "gay:transgender=yes" which is just plain wrong. So to start off, I'm suggest a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

One further thought... There is also a big functional difference between an embassy and a consulate. The former is more government-oriented, whereas consulates provide services to individual citizens. I know this is a big generalisation, but I hope you will agree there is an important

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

Colin Smale wrote: > > The location of an embassy in the capital is surely not prescribed by law, but by expedience isn't it? The ambassador wants/needs to be near the action in order to carry out their primary role - interfacing with the host country government. Answer: Yes. The location of an

Re: [Tagging] Another multipolygon question

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:36 PM Adam Franco wrote: > Hi Dave, all, > > Based on this discussion I just recorded this short tutorial > of how I use JOSM and its Relation Toolbox > plugin to to add adjoining land-cover areas as multipolygons with shared > boundary

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

On 2018-10-23 15:57, Allan Mustard wrote: > Regarding Warin's comment, > >> They did conform to the 'rule' of embassy/high commission only in the >> capital. > > There is a small number of highly visible exceptions to the rule of embassies > and of missions equivalent to embassies being

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

I believe there is already a list of embassy types on the wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dembassy#Types_of_embassies You might want to verify/expand as needed. On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:58 PM Allan Mustard wrote: > Please continue to comment on this proposal: > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (consulate)

Please continue to comment on this proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Consulate I have posted comments received via the tagging mailing list to the discussion page of this proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Consulate Please

Re: [Tagging] Another multipolygon question

Thaks! You make it look so easy... I might take this up for my area. Op ma 22 okt. 2018 om 18:36 schreef Adam Franco : > Hi Dave, all, > > Based on this discussion I just recorded this short tutorial > of how I use JOSM and its Relation Toolbox > plugin to to add

Re: [Tagging] Another multipolygon question

Adam, Many thanks to you. The video was well done and quite interesting. I started using the techniques you described immediately and it has made my life incredibly easier. I had just completed the addition of a huge wood multipolygon to Shuyak Island using my old method yesterday. Then today I

Re: [Tagging] Upcoming removal of power=station and power=sub_station in the standard style

On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:27:01 +1100 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23/10/18 05:04, Yves wrote: > > Daniel, Mateusz and others: if nobody care to review those sub > > stations, this means they need care. > > That's more a concern than an old tag in the DB. > > You want them re tagged,