Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 00:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/09/19 21:52, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 11:02, Marc Gemis wrote: > > so disused:amenity=pub ; building=pub (it looks like a pub); >> building:use=house (or is it :usage?) >> > > Erm, I can't think of any

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

On 27/09/19 21:52, Paul Allen wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 11:02, Marc Gemis > wrote: so disused:amenity=pub ; building=pub (it looks like a pub); building:use=house (or is it :usage?) Erm, I can't think of any pub I've ever been in or past that was in a

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 16:36, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > > 27 Sep 2019, 15:22 by pla16...@gmail.com: > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 13:46, Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: > > 27 Sep 2019, 13:52 by pla16...@gmail.com: > > The status for that is "in use," which makes it a little questionable. > > Why?

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

27 Sep 2019, 15:22 by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 13:46, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> 27 Sep 2019, 13:52 by >> pla16...@gmail.com >> : >> >>> we don't have any tag indicating

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 13:46, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > 27 Sep 2019, 13:52 by pla16...@gmail.com: > > we don't have any tag indicating residential usage other > than building=house > > building:use=residential? > The status for that is "in use," which makes it a little questionable. It also

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

27 Sep 2019, 01:37 by graemefi...@gmail.com: > > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 02:52, Kevin Kenny <> kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > >> >> I've also mapped things like 'disused:amenity=prison >> landuse=brownfield' for a now-closed prison that the state is

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

27 Sep 2019, 13:52 by pla16...@gmail.com: > we don't have any tag indicating residential usage other > than building=house > building:use=residential?___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 11:02, Marc Gemis wrote: so disused:amenity=pub ; building=pub (it looks like a pub); > building:use=house (or is it :usage?) > Erm, I can't think of any pub I've ever been in or past that was in a building that could be described as looking like a pub. All but three or

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 07:28, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Pleased to see that Bessie's in the Gwaun Valley is still the same as ever > though! > You're cursed! Stay away from pubs anywhere near me! Bessie's has only just re-opened.

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

>> A "find a pint of beer near me" app which does a proximity search >> for amenity=pub won't work very well if some of those pubs... aren't pubs. >> >> amenity=pub means "actually a pub", not "thing that looks like a pub". > > > Which is why, for this one, I used disused:amenity=pub. Which

Re: [Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

Paul Allen wrote: > Ummm, which pub in St Dogs? The Teifi Netpool Inn is more of a guest > house with a bar than a pub with guest rooms these days. The White > Hart closed but there's currently an attempt by locals to raise the > money to take it over. (One quick Google later...) Goodness