Re: [Tagging] OHV greater than 50 inches (wide)

2020-09-02 Thread Mike Thompson
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:52 AM Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote: > > In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest > service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and

Re: [Tagging] OHV greater than 50 inches (wide)

2020-09-02 Thread Mike Thompson
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:03 PM brad wrote: > For your example, I would just tag it as motor_vehicle=yes.From what > I've seen, If OHV's >50" are legal, pretty much any motor vehicle is > legal. > Actually, I think I have found some examples in the MVUM (motor vehicle use map) file from the

Re: [Tagging] OHV greater than 50 inches (wide)

2020-09-02 Thread brad
For your example, I would just tag it as motor_vehicle=yes.    From what I've seen, If OHV's >50" are legal, pretty much any motor vehicle is legal. On 9/1/20 2:30 PM, Mike Thompson wrote: In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest service makes a distinction

Re: [Tagging] OHV greater than 50 inches (wide)

2020-09-02 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote: > In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest > service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "OHVs > 50"." > The first two categories correspond to the tags motorcar=* and atv=* I think, > but I