On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:52 AM Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
> > In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
> service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:03 PM brad wrote:
> For your example, I would just tag it as motor_vehicle=yes.From what
> I've seen, If OHV's >50" are legal, pretty much any motor vehicle is
> legal.
>
Actually, I think I have found some examples in the MVUM (motor vehicle use
map) file from the US
For your example, I would just tag it as motor_vehicle=yes. From what
I've seen, If OHV's >50" are legal, pretty much any motor vehicle is legal.
On 9/1/20 2:30 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US
Forest service makes a distinction bet
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
> In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
> service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "OHVs > 50"."
> The first two categories correspond to the tags motorcar=* and atv=* I think,
> but I hav
