You can't really micromap until you micromap for real ;-)
More seriously, there may be no need to split ways down to the *exact* meter to
give the router a sense of the way profile with incline=*.
Yves
Le 26 septembre 2022 02:21:24 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
a écrit :
>tagging
The proposal was not “rejected strongly.”
A majority of people voting approved of the tag, but it did not meet the
75% supermajority
“The result is *Not approved* with 11 votes for and 8 votes against.”
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 7:30 PM Timeo Gut wrote:
> Good day,
>
>
Oh, thanks for spotting!
This also works fine! And has some decent use already.
(and incline=up;down is not the best idea as it
- semantically applies rather when both apply at once across entire object
- is often produced by buggy editors merging ways with incline=up
and incline=down
)
Sep
Good day,
Despite these modes of transport being used by billions of people there
still isn't really any established or properly documented way to map
them in OSM yet.
A proposal to introduce the tag amenity=motorcycle_taxi
There's also the tag incline=up/down which is already used around 400 times.
On 2022-09-26 07:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
tagging incline direction on ways with mtb:scale:uphill is useful
as otherwise you need high-quality elevation model
to do routing, and in some cases it may be
Usage so far is mostly limited to India and the Philippines but there is
established and documented access tagging for auto_rickshaw=* and
cycle_rickshaw=*.
On 2022-09-26 04:58, Alexander Kane wrote:
I think it does rase the question (albeit quite an edge case) of how
to interpret access
tagging incline direction on ways with mtb:scale:uphill is useful
as otherwise you need high-quality elevation model
to do routing, and in some cases it may be unavailable at all in sufficient
detail
I wanted to systematically tag mtb scale info in some places to improve routing
for bicycle
On Sep 25, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Georg wrote:
> stevea wrote Sun Sep 25 2022 00:43:53 GMT+0200
> > Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?
>
> while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
> does not explicitly exclude it but "only" strongly suggests it
Dear all,
stevea wrote Sun Sep 25 2022 00:43:53 GMT+0200
> Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?
while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
does not explicitly exclude it but "only" strongly suggests it by
telling "Usually a paved surface
In Australia, we encourage mappers not to use the town/city, State, or
postcode fields at all when entering addresses!
All they need to enter is the unit number (if applicable & known), street
number & street name.
Thanks
Graeme
On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 18:40, Andrew Hain
wrote:
> Clearly
I think it does rase the question (albeit quite an edge case) of how to
interpret access restrictions. For example, is a pedicab allowed down a way
with bicycle=no, taxi=yes? How about taxi=no and bicycle=yes?
Alex
Georg schrieb am So., 25. Sept. 2022, 23:47:
>
> Hi Dolly,
>
> > Has the OSM
Vào lúc 11:04 2022-09-24, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging đã viết:
My question was about getting notifications of new topics -
to avoid missing RFC/vote.
By the way, the wiki also has tools for keeping track of RfCs and votes
under way. For example, you can track recent changes to any proposal
Hi Dolly,
Has the OSM data model evolved since and are there proper ways to tag
these? Do these fall under amenity=taxi?
in India, all of the mentioned "taxi & bus" variants and some few more
exist (e.g. big auto rickshaws that are used collevtively) and I think
it really makes sense to be
I have made changes to the proposal.
I tried to clarify some things because the proposal is smaller then it seemed
at first. I don't force people to discuss on the forum, nor does the current
proposal process require discussion on the mailing list. The recommended
discussion place is and
Hello everyone,
In Madagascar we have all of these :
- motorcyle taxis (ojek/boda boda...)
- bicycle taxis
- auto rickshaws (tuk tuk/bajaj)
- cycle rickshaws
- human pulled rickshaws (pousse pousse)
Tried to search the wiki, this mailing lists
, taginfo... but havent found proper tags.
Has the
Norwegian addresses do not use city or town as a term.
Cities and towns are historical terminology in common usage when
referring to large and small settlements, and they used to carry
official designation and significance (mostly related to trading
rights), but they are not used officially
As for the Philippines addr:town essentially always contains the name of
the major location in an address.
The bulk of these occurences were added in a manual import of 40.000+
public schools where addr:town tag was assigned over addr:city for all
schools that are located in municipalities
Clearly mappers in Bosnia, South Korea, Australia and particularly the
Philippines should be asked about this. I am also concerned that the current
description (“The town of the object that forms part of the address”)
encourages using the tag instead of addr:city.
--
Andrew
1 and 2) yes. Select a tag, for example:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/tag/tagging and click the bell icon. There
you have several options about the intensity of notifications. You can for
example follow everything, topics and comments. You can for example get a
notification about new
19 matches
Mail list logo
