I also support that mass retagging of building=entrance nodes attached to
buildings.
--
Andrew
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: 13 December 2022 00:26
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=entrance
sent from a phone
>
sent from a phone
> On 12 Dec 2022, at 22:13, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> i dislike the idea to have tag with several meaning depending
> if it's on a node or a closed way
One could say the distinction is in the meaning, not in the object type,
there is a tag that was used in the past on nodes
Le 12.12.22 à 20:27, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
it doesn't look like to be a building but a indoor=* (root ? entrance ?)
and sometime a building:part (for 3D tag)
i
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:51 PM Jmapb wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
> > using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
> >
> > It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so
On 12/12/2022 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so there
is not much hindering people from using it, just that
The only problem I see with many top-level tags is editors would need to make 4
very similar presets, which is pretty confusing and forces mappers to pick one
option, even if they don't understand the difference...
___
Tagging mailing list
sorry, missed the link https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22570
any comments on the tag? Someone else using it for buildings?
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is using
building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so there is not
much hindering people from using it, just that there was the bad practice
to use the same tag on
On 11/11/22 23:25, Casper Kersten wrote:
Site relations are usually completely redundant if you just tag an
operator=* tag. A tourism=camp_site closed way or multipolygon is,
of course, a camp site, and a shop or parking area on or belonging to
that camp site should get an operator=* tag with
On 10/11/22 22:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 10 Nov 2022, at 12:31, Yves via Tagging wrote:
Site relations are often used to models thing that aren't spatially joined,
like windfarms, universities...
I can easily imagine it's reasonable to use them for campings in
Am So., 11. Dez. 2022 um 04:25 Uhr schrieb Kyle Hensel <
k.y@outlook.co.nz>:
> I think we need a new tag then. In New Zealand dry risers are not allowed
> for new buildings, since charged systems are safer...
>
>
>
> François’s suggestion of emergency=riser_inlet + a sub tag seems like a
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
