Re: [Tagging] FYI: Automatic detection of left-hand/right-hand traffic in JOSM style Lane and road attributes

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: This is a great style! I tagged a big part of my citys turn lanes just because this style exists. +1 I'm doing the same in Belgium. It's great to see this map

Re: [Tagging] Signal-controlled roundabouts

There is a similar situation near Geel, Belgium. First they constructed several roundabouts along the R14, then they turned them back to regular crossings Only the roundabout with the N19 is kept at the moment, but there they placed traffic signals (http://osm.org/go/0ErQgoDk--?m=relation=1263541

Re: [Tagging] editing polygons in JOSM

Since you were also looking for more appropriate places to ask those questions: The help-website: http://help.openstreetmap.org or the editors forum : http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=54 regards On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.dewrote: Am

Re: [Tagging] Turn lane tagging

should have been: big thank you On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote: I use the style https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes for the same project as you. It's very powerful and I think the author deserves a big think you

Re: [Tagging] Turn lane tagging

I use the style https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Styles/Lane_and_Road_Attributes for the same project as you. It's very powerful and I think the author deserves a big think you. regards m On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote: None of the area I am in has

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

I tagged noexit=yes on the ways. Why ? If I remember correctly some more experienced mapper told me it was ok to do so. And perhaps I read the wiki page before June 28, 2011, when there was nothing mentioned about way or node. You cannot assume each mapper reads all wiki pages every week or

Re: [Tagging] noexit=yes on ways ?

as a connection (because of oversize of rendered ways). But this could be determined by preprocessing also. Georg On 2014-04-08 13:33, Marc Gemis wrote : I tagged noexit=yes on the ways. Why ? If I remember correctly some more experienced mapper told me it was ok to do so. And perhaps I

[Tagging] historic=vicarage -- and other historic building types

it is more specific than Re: Contents of Tagging digest... Today's Topics: 1. historic=vicarage (Marc Gemis) 2. Re: historic=vicarage (John Sturdy) 3. Re: historic=vicarage (Ren? Kirchhoff) -- Message: 1 Date

[Tagging] historic=vicarage

I'm currently mapping the protected monuments in Belgium. One of the buildings you encounter are vicarages. I looked at taginfo, but couldn't find an appropriate tag. What should I use ? historic = vicarage or parsonage or rectory or presbytery ? It's for roman-catholic pastors in case that

Re: [Tagging] Public transport zones

Let me try to clarify this. In case there are 2 companies stopping at a particular station, they both might have different properties for that stop: e.g. the names, reference numbers and zones. So the zone might depend on the company (both bus transportation), not on the form of transportation

Re: [Tagging] Public transport zones

Why is zone ambiguous on a bus_stop ? Or any more ambiguous than name ? The latter is also used for so many different things. I see no need to make new tags for each new zone concept. This is only needed when 1 item can belong to different types of zones. When you need 2 different zones for

<    2   3   4   5   6   7