On 2020-10-24 9:32 a.m., Janko Mihelić wrote:
> Here is my proposal on the wiki:
> In short, we don't have any way to connect places that need a ticket for
> entrance, with the place that sells those tickets. Usually those places
On 2020-10-20 12:13 p.m., Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 19/10/2020 16.01, Justin Tracey wrote:
>> It's the same reason we want
>> discourse on lists like this one to be friendly and amicable: it should
>> be obvious to anyone outside looking in that contributing and
On 2020-10-19 4:13 a.m., Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> On 10/14/20 19:54, Robert Delmenico wrote:
>> I'm proposing that we change the man_made tag to human_made.
>> I feel it is a discussion that we need to have as there seems to be
>> little discussion to date.
> I will vote
On 2020-08-14 10:48 a.m., Paul Allen wrote:
> 3) That, one day, routers might preferentially route along tree-lined
> rather than non-tree-lined roads, in the same way they preferentially
> along lit roads. Do any route along lit roads? I can see that a
> router which
asture in Spain, if I recall
> Since almost any 2 types of agricultural land can be combined, it
> might be better to think about a wholistic solution, since as a way to
> tag the secondary landuse or secondary vegetation of a certain area.
> - Joseph
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7
On 2020-07-30 7:40 a.m., Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 12:34, joost schouppe > wrote:
> Someone tried to map a "food forest" near me.
> The best I could come up with, given that it described itself as part
> was landuse=orchard.
If the festival is held at some date expressible using the opening hours
syntax, you could use the "open hours" tag or add conditions to the
"access" tags. Though these tend to represent temporary
accessibility, not temporary existence the way "intermittent" or
"seasonal" do. I'll also
Another major exceptions where mapping as an internal node is better, IME,
are notable (historical) buildings that currently house a business. More
generally, if the tags of the building and business would conflict (e.g.,
name), then it makes sense to keep them as separate features.