sent from a phone
> On 19. May 2019, at 13:26, marc marc wrote:
>
> indeed but putting the tag not on the building currently lost the info
> "this poi use the whole building"
> adding a polygone with the same outer doesn't solve it (a shop may use a
> level and not the whole building
if
Le 19.05.19 à 11:29, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> 1. differentiation of building and user (distinct objects also when the whole
> building is occupied by one user)
indeed but putting the tag not on the building currently lost the info
"this poi use the whole building"
adding a polygone with
sent from a phone
> On 19. May 2019, at 10:25, Jan S wrote:
>
> I'd think so, as long as the police (or other government offices) occupy the
> entire building. Otherwise it would just be a node on the building.
>
> Could anyone take that into the wiki?
while it is often done like this,
Am 19. Mai 2019 06:10:21 MESZ schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick
:
>Would the police then work under building=government (which was
>discussed a
>while back) + police=xxx?
I'd think so, as long as the police (or other government offices) occupy the
entire building. Otherwise it would just be a node
On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 06:12, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> It is the same as with say shop=supermarket.
>
> It is not enough to tag shop=supermarket to indicate that building exists,
> you still need to have building tag (maybe on the same object, maybe on a
> separate way).
>
Which seems to be
18 May 2019, 22:07 by si...@poole.ch:
>
>
>
> Am 18.05.2019 um 11:44 schrieb Jan S:
>
>> Interesting point... I'd suggest that it is a top-level tag itself.
>> Otherwise you'd have to tag buildings as building=* and police=*, which
>> I find an unnecessary duplication that might
Am 18.05.2019 um 11:44 schrieb Jan S:
> Interesting point... I'd suggest that it is a top-level tag itself.
> Otherwise you'd have to tag buildings as building=* and police=*,
> which I find an unnecessary duplication that might even result in
> contradictory tags.
I think you will find that
I also see it as a top-level tag. i find it similar to the recent
"healthcare=*" which can be used by itself too.
Le sam. 18 mai 2019 à 11:46, Jan S a écrit :
> Interesting point... I'd suggest that it is a top-level tag itself.
> Otherwise you'd have to tag buildings as building=* and
Interesting point... I'd suggest that it is a top-level tag itself. Otherwise
you'd have to tag buildings as building=* and police=*, which I find an
unnecessary duplication that might even result in contradictory tags.
Best, Jan
Am 18. Mai 2019 10:36:32 MESZ schrieb Simon Poole :
>Seems as if
Seems as if the proposal and now the definite wiki page is missing one,
not quite unimportant, bit of information:
is police an attribute to be used on other "top-level" (say for example
building=xx OSM objects or does it define a stand alone "top-level"
object itself?
Simon
Am 17.05.2019 um
Hi Graeme,
I've just seen that. I've used the taglist template, but apparently it
doesen't work as intended. I'll make a manual list.
Best,
Jan
Am Sa., 18. Mai 2019 um 01:06 Uhr schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick <
graemefi...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 07:05, Jan S wrote:
>
>>
>> I've
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 07:05, Jan S wrote:
>
> I've created the pages https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:police and
> subpages for values police=barracks, police=car_pound, police=car_repair,
> police=checkpoint, police=detention, police=naval_base, police=offices,
> police=range,
Hi everyone,
I've created the pages https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:police and
subpages for values police=barracks, police=car_pound, police=car_repair,
police=checkpoint, police=detention, police=naval_base, police=offices,
police=range, police=storage and police=training area, as well
13 matches
Mail list logo
