I suggested on the pistemap discussion page to move the page to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps
Along with creating a proposal on its own for 'landuse=winter_sports'
About this, piste:boundary= is discussed on the discussion page. There
is also a proposal for site=piste relation,
I have a few objections about that proposal:
landuse=winter_sports
I don't like this way of confining a ski resort. First,
landuse=winter_sports here is used to tag a ski resort. That can't be
right, because a restaurant can be a part of a ski resort, and it isn't
used for winter sports. Second,
Interesting. . . I've only skied in the US and Canada and mostly in the western
US. Most if not all the alpine/downhill ski areas I've been to have very
definitely marked boundaries. There are backcountry and cross country/nordic
skiing areas I've been to where the boundaries are vague and
Janko, I think you understood: I posted here because the proposal is
widely used, and pretty stable for a long time. It hasn't undergone any
voting process whatsoever, but here it is (in km):
{
downhill: 24105,
nordic: 29593,
aerialway: 16051,
skitour: 1171,
sled: 931 ,
snowshoeing: 356,
On 2/25/14 4:27 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
I have a few objections about that proposal:
landuse=winter_sports
I don't like this way of confining a ski resort. First,
landuse=winter_sports here is used to tag a ski resort. That can't be
right, because a restaurant can be a part of a ski resort,
On 25.02.14 22:27, Janko Mihelić wrote:
landuse=winter_sports
I don't like this way of confining a ski resort.
Agreed. This probably is an area where grass is growing. Maybe it is used as a
meadow in summer, maybe this is covered with straw, maybe it is used to produce
hay. This could only be
