Yup,
Thats why im simply pointing out where there are inconsistancies.
In each editor and each language osm-wiki there are different labels
for the same tags, in the language of OSMish'.
By converting back from the language to english, i can see what the
'intent' is. I have added a column for the
2011/5/18 Sam Vekemans :
> I'll also include a Wikipedia word-definition for each value, as the aim for
> this is to not duplicate into other languages, but to 'look at' what the
> other language pages have done, then to a google-translate and fill in the
> details.
You can of course include wiki
It got to 10 messages lol...
... Spam? Only if it's in a can and mixed with other unknown meat..
In other news, I have the latest version of the Master spreadsheet available
v0.3.0
https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0Am70fsptsPF2dHJxMG05Zmg2YS1LeFg2czRZOWZEU3c&output=html
(w
On 18/05/2011 12:19, M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/5/18:
In American usage, seafood covers all aquatic-origin food, whether from fresh
water, estuaries, or the ocean.
In the context of OSM I am more interested in the British usage.
The word was invented by the Americans in the early 19th
2011/5/18 :
> In American usage, seafood covers all aquatic-origin food, whether from fresh
> water, estuaries, or the ocean.
In the context of OSM I am more interested in the British usage.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreet
In American usage, seafood covers all aquatic-origin food, whether from fresh
water, estuaries, or the ocean.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] [Spam?] JOSM wiki Potlatch2 In consistencesfishmonger
vs. seafood
>From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Date :Mon May 16 18:33
