On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
As I understand it, NE2 was looking for a tagging scheme that would allow
for searches to find trails on a railway grade. Searching for rail trails
The use case is literally to find flattish bike paths? Searching for
rail
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Masi Master masi-mas...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Some month ago I tried to start a proposal for rail-trails:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/rail_trail
I startet it with 'rail_trail=yes', but on talk-page some are against this,
because
* Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com [2012-07-03 17:22 +1000]:
For the original question of how to tag a rail with trail (I've also
heard the term railside trail), is it not sufficient to simply map
the two ways separately? Example here:
http://osm.org/go/uG4lkKxG?layers=C
As I understand it,
Phil! Gold wrote:
As I understand it, NE2 was looking for a tagging scheme that would
allow for searches to find trails on a railway grade.
That might not have the desired effect in all cases:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.068937lon=-4.077433zoom=18layers=C
:-)
Cheers,
Andy
* SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk [2012-07-03 13:37 +0100]:
Phil! Gold wrote:
As I understand it, NE2 was looking for a tagging scheme that
would allow for searches to find trails on a railway grade.
That might not have the desired effect in all cases:
* Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com [2012-06-27 12:59 -0400]:
But another popular kind of rail trail, a rail with trail, cannot
be found in this manner.
[snip]
Does anyone have any ideas for tagging? The simplest would be
something like rail_with_trail=yes or maybe railway=adjacent.
Either
Hi,
Some month ago I tried to start a proposal for rail-trails:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/rail_trail
I startet it with 'rail_trail=yes', but on talk-page some are against
this, because highway=cycleway/footway + railway=abandoned are enough.
Now it propose only the
