Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

Hi Illia, Thank you very much for sharing the link. I have had a look at it before but since the description focused on flooded roads and road signs and not area hazards I didn`t go further with it. However, I can see now how having two too similar tags on flooding could be confusing. I would

Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

Just see wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hazard=flooding Regards, Illia. Cornelia Scholz via Tagging : > Hi all, > > Many thanks for the responses and feedback! :) Here a few comments: > > - The aim would be to collect information on historic floods and community > knowledge of hazard exposure.

Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

Hi all, Many thanks for the responses and feedback! :) Here a few comments: - The aim would be to collect information on historic floods and community knowledge of hazard exposure. I work for the Red Cross Climate Centre on hazard assessments in typically data scarce areas (e.g. East Sudan).

Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

Noted. I was [over]reacting to the section from OP about return periods. If this proposal is specifically about areas of historical flooding rather than areas deemed at risk of flooding then they *can* be observed on-the-ground. On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, 01:08 Andy Townsend, wrote: > On

Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

On 15/06/2023 20:47, Jez Nicholson wrote: Whilst it is a great idea to capture local knowledge about flooding, especially where it is currently not available, I am concerned that this doesn't have on-the-ground verification. I don't think that anyone has suggested that - at least not in this

Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

Whilst it is a great idea to capture local knowledge about flooding, especially where it is currently not available, I am concerned that this doesn't have on-the-ground verification. Flood risk areas are predictions generated via modelling software and it depends on which software you use, and

Re: [Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

On 15/06/2023 16:59, Cornelia Scholz via Tagging wrote: Dear all, I would like to propose to add*'flood'* as value to the *key 'hazard'* (to be used in combination with the tag*boundary=hazard*). ... What already exists is the key flood_prone

[Tagging] Adding 'flood' as value to the key 'hazard' (to be used in combination with the tag boundary=hazard)

Dear all, I would like to propose to add* 'flood'* as value to the *key 'hazard'* (to be used in combination with the tag* boundary=hazard*). Proposal: Hazard =flood would be used in combination with boundary=hazard