Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-11-01 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 1. Nov 2018, at 15:47, bkil wrote: > > I initially disliked the idea of only tagging retail landuse for mixed-use > urban centers, but it makes sense based on the need to tag one feature on one > area, and the limited options for rendering maps with overlapping

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-11-01 Thread bkil
Yes, I agree that this sounds reasonable. On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:23 AM Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > If it’s 40 storeys of apartments above a 3 storey mall, use landuse=retail > for the whole mall area, and building=apartment for the residential towers. > The whole, larger mall building could

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-30 Thread Michael Patrick
> If it’s 40 storeys of apartments above a 3 storey mall, use landuse=retail for the whole mall area, and building=apartment for the residential towers. The whole, larger mall building could probably be building=mall; it sounds like there are several tall but narrow residential towers around or on

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
If it’s 40 storeys of apartments above a 3 storey mall, use landuse=retail for the whole mall area, and building=apartment for the residential towers. The whole, larger mall building could probably be building=mall; it sounds like there are several tall but narrow residential towers around or on

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 08:51, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > We should map the most intensive landuse, from a map user standpoint. So a > mixed-use area of tall buildings would be retail. There might be condos and > apartments on the 20th to 40th floor, offices on the 10th 20th floors, a > garage for

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
We should map the most intensive landuse, from a map user standpoint. So a mixed-use area of tall buildings would be retail. There might be condos and apartments on the 20th to 40th floor, offices on the 10th 20th floors, a garage for cars from floor 2 to 9, but the first couple of levels are

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread bkil
I use commercial and retail landuse a lot. If you plan to do some refactoring, please consider that a map is most informative if it has distinct colours. if we applied landuse=residential on hotels, it would blend in with other houses. To me, mapping non-housing areas where some kind of commercial

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 23:23, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > - Hotels are more about services than sale, so i wouldn't use > landuse=retail for them. Maybe landuse=residential? > I think that one would depend on what sort of hotel we're talking about? Is it a place to stay:

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread SelfishSeahorse
I'm not very happy with our definition of landuse=commercial as it isn't self-explanatory: it is mainly used for offices and warehouses, while retail, although belonging to commerce, has its own landuse=* value. In my opinion, it would make more sense either to tag retail as landuse=commercial +

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-29 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
I made first edits - documenting that restaurants, fast food places, fuel stations areconsidered retail for landuse purposes - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:landuse%3Dretail=1686815=1685021

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-28 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 08:26, Daniel Koć wrote: > "Commercial landuse mainly deals with services and trade (tertiary sector > ). Such area > may consists of offices, administration, laboratories, warehouses > (logistics park), car

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-28 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 28.10.2018 o 23:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick pisze: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 07:32, Mateusz Konieczny > mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>> wrote: > > Based on my understanding of term "commercial ara" and how landuse > tagging is used in OSM > I think that area with restaurants, hotels,

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
28. Oct 2018 23:14 by graemefi...@gmail.com : > On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 07:32, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > >> >> Based on my understanding of term "commercial ara" and how >> landuse tagging

Re: [Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-28 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 07:32, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Based on my understanding of term "commercial ara" and how landuse tagging > is used in OSM > I think that area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas fits > landuse=commercial. > I would have thought that it would be =retail rather than

[Tagging] Area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas - is it landuse=commercial?

2018-10-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Based on my understanding of term "commercial ara" and how landuse tagging is used in OSMI think that area with restaurants, hotels, cinemas fits landuse=commercial. But I want to confirm that before editinghttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial