On 27.06.20 11:18, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> unlike other many image gathering sites, images there are
> likely to be reusable and with at least basic info being
> machine readable
None of this changes if the Commons image is linked from the image tag,
though. And in fact, I feel thes
Please decide which edit you are proposing to run, you mentioned two
contradictory algorithms.
And then actually propose it.
For the record, I oppose deprecating wikimedia_commons and removing it with a
bot.
We would start to specify both commons_category and commons_file?
"Changesets will be
Jun 26, 2020, 20:09 by o...@tobias-knerr.de:
> * Deprecate wikimedia_commons=* (because it unhelpfully mixes links to
> categories, images, and other media types – I agree that's an issue)
> * Move category links to commons_category=*
> * Move image links to image=*
>
I strongly dislike idea of
Move category links to commons_category=*
+1
It might make sense to choose a more generic name like image_category or
image_folder, so that any set of images, from any host, related to an osm
object can be linked.
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 20:11, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> On 25.06.20 19:57, p
On 25.06.20 19:57, pangoSE wrote:
> I recently started discussing the problems related to urls and
> File:filename.* that links to wikimedia_commons using the tag. See
> Talk:Key:image#Discourage_linking_to_commons_files_and_migrate_all_File:filename..2A_values_and_direct_urls_to_wikimedia_commons
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 20:24, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> There are currently 28k objects with wikimedia_commons in the database.
> Your edit would treble that. I'm not convinced that automatic edits that
> massively boost a niche tag are a good idea.
"niche"?
> I am not comfortable with inventing n
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 22:14 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Btw, there are also a few images tagged with a “flickr” key (~1200)
>
> While it could eventually make sense to make an exception for
> wikimedia commons, I do not believe we should create a new key for
> every image hosting service.
Jun 26, 2020, 08:51 by pang...@riseup.net:
> Is there anything preventing us from running bots (with simple
> algorithms) on the database?
>
Nothing?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
See for example
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/M
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jun 2020, at 08:53, pangoSE wrote:
>
> For me there are 2 categories: sites hosting free images like
> Flickr, Mapillary and Commons and all the rest.
Flickr is only at 1200 tag occurrences in total and we should stop this
fragmentation IMHO. They are not free eit
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jun 2020, at 08:53, pangoSE wrote:
>
> Is there anything preventing us from running bots (with simple
> algorithms) on the database? Wikimedia projects do that all the time. I
> rarely see this in OSM (besides the http/https bot)
We should be really reluctant, I se
thanks for the constructive suggestions :)
Den Thu, 25 Jun 2020 22:14:21 +0200
skrev Re: [Tagging] Automated edit of image tags suggestion:
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 25. Jun 2020, at 19:59, pangoSE wrote:
> >
> > image=File:* -> commons_file=File:* image=Categor
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 15:19 Martin Koppenhoefer,
wrote:
>
> there might be an issue with multiple images separated by ; because the
> semicolon does not have to be escaped in URLs. If the protocol is given
> every time it might still be ok? e.g.
> http://111.com/example1.jpg;http://111.com/exampl
sent from a phone
> On 25. Jun 2020, at 19:59, pangoSE wrote:
>
> image=File:* -> commons_file=File:* image=Category:* ->
> commons_category=Category:* image=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:*
> -> commons_file=File:* image=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:* ->
> commons_c
Hi pangoSE,
On 6/25/20 19:57, pangoSE wrote:
> I recently started discussing the problems related to urls and
> File:filename.* that links to wikimedia_commons using the tag. See
> Talk:Key:image#Discourage_linking_to_commons_files_and_migrate_all_File:filename..2A_values_and_direct_urls_to_wikime
sent from a phone
> On 25. Jun 2020, at 19:59, pangoSE wrote:
>
> There are some image= tags that link to multiple images separated by ";".
> These will be manually migrated to contain only one image that is not linking
> to commons and the rest in a note, note1, noteX if multiple urls.
t
Originalmeddelande
Från: pangoSE
Skickat: 25 juni 2020 19:49:58 CEST
Till: tagg...@lists.openstreetmap.org
Ämne: Automated edit of image tags suggestion
Below is a copy of the text at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/pangoSE#Key:image
Key:imageEdit
The
16 matches
Mail list logo
