Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-21 Thread André Pirard
On 2015-08-04 14:57, Dave F. wrote : Hi wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:contact I remember a discussion a while back about this. As the page makes no mention of the logic behind, could someone please remind me of the reasoning advantage over straight forward phone, fax,

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Goss
Isn't so addr: as well? I actually don't like the addr: either. Because in most editors it means I have to type addr:s to get autocomplete, while it just have to type ph to get phone. Especially on mobile with the : it's not that great. In addition we have so many tools and good editors

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 09.08.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Richard ricoz@gmail.com: that is the exact point explaining why there is a need for contact:website. A website= is generally not a contact page but the homepage. Otoh contact:website= should contain a specific page for conatct, be

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Richard
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Am 07.08.2015 um 00:38 schrieb Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com: For some tag developments i can see the benefits, but I'm struggling with this one I'm afraid. +1 while in the

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread John Willis
On Aug 10, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: Overall I only see that this in some way might be usefull for phone and email. But I think it's better to assume phone= is used for some basic contact number and then use other tags like phone:emergency= or

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Goss
while in the addr:-namespace all keys are actually address components, this can be contested for the contact: namespace. A website for instance is not primarily a means of contact, sometimes it might not be suitable at all for contact purposes, but still there are generally good reasons to add

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-07 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 07.08.2015 um 00:38 schrieb Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com: For some tag developments i can see the benefits, but I'm struggling with this one I'm afraid. +1 while in the addr:-namespace all keys are actually address components, this can be contested for the

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-06 Thread Dave F.
On 04/08/2015 14:07, Michał Brzozowski wrote: This means just not to add contact details of private persons like me or you. OK, but it needs to be amended because that's not what it says As per contact: prefix, opponents argue it's redundant. Isn't so addr: as well? In reality keys with and

[Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-04 Thread Dave F.
Hi wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:contact I remember a discussion a while back about this. As the page makes no mention of the logic behind, could someone please remind me of the reasoning advantage over straight forward phone, fax, website etc. You should only add contact

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-04 Thread Michał Brzozowski
This means just not to add contact details of private persons like me or you. As per contact: prefix, opponents argue it's redundant. Isn't so addr: as well? In reality keys with and without contact: are equivalent. My argument for using it is that new popular services for communication appear