Re: [Tagging] Default access for service=driveway?

2020-12-22 Thread Adam Franco
> > 1. Should a routing engine automatically assume that something tagged a > "driveway" is not suitable for through traffic? For motor vehicles through traffic seems inappropriate by default, but for pedestrians I would think it is generally ok. Bicycles are somewhere between. The case Frederik

Re: [Tagging] Default access for service=driveway?

2020-12-22 Thread Niels Elgaard Larsen
På Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:14:39 +0100 Frederik Ramm skrev: >Hi, > >1. Should a routing engine automatically assume that something tagged a >"driveway" is not suitable for through traffic? We must have millions of intersections between driveways and cycle paths and sidewalks along roads. Certainly

Re: [Tagging] Default access for service=driveway?

2020-12-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Di., 22. Dez. 2020 um 10:16 Uhr schrieb Frederik Ramm < frede...@remote.org>: > The private residential property has two driveways (highway=service, > service=driveway) entering it from different sides, thereby enabling > people to save a few metres by walking through, rather than around, the >

[Tagging] Default access for service=driveway?

2020-12-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, A property owner in Germany has complained that several routing engines - crucially also the one used by the local transport authority - route pedestrians trough their private residential property as a "shortcut" for accessing a bus stop. The private residential property has two driveways (hi