Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Through service
On Saturday 17 September 2016 12:13:49 Michael Reichert wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 2016-09-14 um 05:10 schrieb Michael Tsang: > > RFC: Through service > > > > This proposes a kind of relation to associate different public transport > > services to become a through service, i.e. the vehicles run through the > > services sequentially, allowing passengers staying on board. > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_service > > I dislike the tagging you propose. A relation with type=route route=* > should contain only nodes and ways. Relations should only be member if > they are multipolygon relations. If you want to link multiple route > relations, please use a master route relation. > type=route_master + route_master=bus/train/bicycle > > Best regards > > Michael I don't think using a route_master is appropriate for this situation. route_master is for grouping related but different services together (e.g. the outbound and return journeys of a bus route, and the weekdays / holidays variant of that route), but this situation is completely opposite, about a single service composed of segments of different refs. Michael -- Sent from KMail ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Through service
Hi Michael, Am 2016-09-14 um 05:10 schrieb Michael Tsang: > RFC: Through service > > This proposes a kind of relation to associate different public transport > services to become a through service, i.e. the vehicles run through the > services sequentially, allowing passengers staying on board. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_service I dislike the tagging you propose. A relation with type=route route=* should contain only nodes and ways. Relations should only be member if they are multipolygon relations. If you want to link multiple route relations, please use a master route relation. type=route_master + route_master=bus/train/bicycle Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Through service
RFC: Through service This proposes a kind of relation to associate different public transport services to become a through service, i.e. the vehicles run through the services sequentially, allowing passengers staying on board. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_service -- Sent from KMail ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
