On 26.06.2013 18:35, Clifford Snow wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:55 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
mailto:lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does not work for me !
I have several areas of mixed use of industrial, commercial and
residential. Often living is allowed but
Am 26.06.2013 um 00:25 schrieb Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us:
A new tag called residential, where the value specifies the type of
residential, such as:
residential=apartment
residential=condo
residential=co-op
residential=single_room_occupancy
(these would be open for
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
Not sure if I can agree, what does this tag residential express? Is this
a building type? A building usage tag? How does it relate to landuse, how
to building=building-type and established values?
Landuse is a
Am 26.06.2013 17:28, schrieb Clifford Snow:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
dieterdre...@gmail.com mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if I can agree, what does this tag residential express?
Is this a building type? A building usage tag? How does it
2013/6/26 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Landuse is a different issue. For example, my condo is in a commercial
landuse area. Because the condo building includes two levels on
commercial space, having residential units within the commercial landuse
is acceptable. In fact, it is highly
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:55 AM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does not work for me !
I have several areas of mixed use of industrial, commercial and
residential. Often living is allowed but I know streets where it is only
allowed on one side or even changing from house number to
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
After discussing it on IRC, how does this sound as a potential for a
proposal:
A new tag called residential, where the value specifies the type of
residential, such as:
residential=apartment
residential=condo
On 2013-06-23 20:54, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
While we're on the subject of building tagging:
Prior to major building outline imports, OSM tended to contain mostly
important or notable building outlines. People might do a business
district, or the largest buildings in town, or the church, or zoo...
On 23/giu/2013, at 20:45, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Then we need many or all of:
building=yes
commercial=
residential=
hotel=
amenity=parking
man_made=tower
shop=
Every building is of a type, and this type preferably goes into the building
value. IMHO we should go
After discussing it on IRC, how does this sound as a potential for a proposal:
A new tag called residential, where the value specifies the type of
residential, such as:
residential=apartment
residential=condo
residential=co-op
residential=single_room_occupancy
(these would be open for
Serge;
So you mean for an existing building outline tagged:
building=retail
You might recognize the residential separately:
building=retail
residential=apartment;condo
And start putting in nodes for each (ground level) business?
---
Note that a substantial number of high rises have three or
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
Serge;
So you mean for an existing building outline tagged:
building=retail
You might recognize the residential separately:
building=retail
residential=apartment;condo
No.
building=retail doesn't make sense for a
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.comwrote:
building=yes
and then add appropriate nodes, which in this case, would include
residential=[SOME VALUE]
Then we need many or all of:
- building=yes
- commercial=
- residential=
- hotel=
-
While we're on the subject of building tagging:
Prior to major building outline imports, OSM tended to contain mostly
important or notable building outlines. People might do a business
district, or the largest buildings in town, or the church, or zoo... but
few did every house and garden shed.
The City of Oakland's downtown:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=37.80321lon=-122.26395zoom=15layers=M
I think is an example of a map that with organic building outlines looks
quite pleasing. Add all the building outlines and you loose something...
___
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
building=yes
and then add appropriate nodes, which in this case, would include
residential=[SOME VALUE]
Then we need many or all of:
building=yes
commercial=
residential=
hotel=
amenity=parking
man_made=tower
Bryce, this is entirely a rendering issue. Map creators can (and always to
some degree do) select to display only features with certain tags, or that
have names, or are of a certain size, etc, depending on their audience and
what they're trying to show. For example, notable buildings for
Indeed, yet rendering issues have to work on a foundation of tagging. In
the old days of paper maps a cartographer made the decisions about what's
notable enough to show. Here we have to do it with tags (and consensus tags
at that).
To infer notability of building outlines, there are some
Like many large cities, we have apartments that are on the upper stories of
multi-use buildings. The lower level(s) usually contain shops and business
services.
My thoughts are 1) tag the building as an apartment building, and just add
the businesses and 2) add a node as an apartment, but I'm not
This is a tough one. Maybe use the height attribute? I'd tag the bldg with its
predominant use though.
—
Elliott Plack
Sent from Mailbox on iPhone 5
about.me/elliottp
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
Like many large cities, we have apartments that
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
Like many large cities, we have apartments that are on the upper stories of
multi-use buildings. The lower level(s) usually contain shops and business
services.
This is nearly every single building in New York City,
21 matches
Mail list logo
