It depends on what map is supposed to display. In this case I want a
city-wide map with oneway roads that are potential candidates
for designating them as contraflow for bicycles (all oneway roads without
oneway:bicycle=no that are not a dual carriageways).
I implemented it using dual_carriageway=
How is this, in any way, incorrect rendering, particularly at higher zoom
levels?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> Road itself is not oneway as it has two one-way carriageways in opposite
> directions. Carriageways are mapped in OSM as separate one-way ways.
>
>
> 201
Sounds like an area encompassing all involving "landuse=highway" couldn't
hurt, either.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I am thinking about marking tagging roads with separate carriageways. I
> want to create map with oneway roads, but in OSM data roads with separate
On Jul 10, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Jesse Crawford wrote:
> An example situation is visible here:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/34.05688/-106.89005
>
> Both California St and the nearby I-25 are two-way streets made up of two
> parallel one-way streets. This has the advantage of thorough data
An example situation is visible here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/34.05688/-106.89005
Both California St and the nearby I-25 are two-way streets made up of two
parallel one-way streets. This has the advantage of thorough data, but it
introduces two issues that I see:
1) Information on cr
Road itself is not oneway as it has two one-way carriageways in opposite
directions. Carriageways are mapped in OSM as separate one-way ways.
2014-07-10 21:32 GMT+02:00 John F. Eldredge :
> I am confused. You state that the road is divided into two carriageways,
> that neither carriageway is one
I am confused. You state that the road is divided into two carriageways, that
neither carriageway is one-way, and also that each carriageway is one-way. How
can a given carriageway be both one-way and not one-way at the same time?
On July 10, 2014 5:20:16 AM CDT, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> I
2014-07-10 12:20 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny :
> I am thinking about marking tagging roads with separate carriageways. I
> want to create map with oneway roads, but in OSM data roads with separate
> carriageways that are not oneway are frequently represented as separate
> ways, both tagged as onew
I think I just ignored very short links, so I don't think it would help in
that case.
Very roughly, I calculated the bearing of each way, and matched up ones
that were within a few metres laterally and a few degrees of 180deg of each
other.
Richard
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Mateusz Koni
>
> I did manage to do it (reasonably accurately) by algorithm for the UK, but
> it was a bit of a pain.
>
Can you share it? Currently I have absolutely no idea how to solve case of
link type roads that are not really links ( cases like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182138211 ).
__
I did manage to do it (reasonably accurately) by algorithm for the UK, but
it was a bit of a pain.
Adding dual_carriageway=yes tags, particularly in urban areas, wouldn't
hurt.
Richard
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I am thinking about marking tagging roads with
I am thinking about marking tagging roads with separate carriageways. I
want to create map with oneway roads, but in OSM data roads with separate
carriageways that are not oneway are frequently represented as separate
ways, both tagged as oneway.
Adding tag that that would describe way as part of
12 matches
Mail list logo
