On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:52 AM Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
> > In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
> service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:03 PM brad wrote:
> For your example, I would just tag it as motor_vehicle=yes.From what
> I've seen, If OHV's >50" are legal, pretty much any motor vehicle is
> legal.
>
Actually, I think I have found some examples in the MVUM (motor vehicle use
map) file from the
For your example, I would just tag it as motor_vehicle=yes. From what
I've seen, If OHV's >50" are legal, pretty much any motor vehicle is legal.
On 9/1/20 2:30 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US
Forest service makes a distinction
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 21:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
> In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
> service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "OHVs > 50"."
> The first two categories correspond to the tags motorcar=* and atv=* I think,
> but I
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:46 PM Kevin Broderick
wrote:
> More likely than prohibiting bikes, the USFS could allow
> non-street-registered OHVs over 50" on a trail, but keep it closed to
> normal street-registered vehicles;
>
Not sure if I have ever seen that, but we would still need a way of
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 3:28 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 1. Sep 2020, at 22:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
> >
> > OHVs > 50
>
>
> is there also an upper limit?
No legal upper limit that I am aware of. In practicality, the wider (and
longer) a vehicle is, the more
More likely than prohibiting bikes, the USFS could allow
non-street-registered OHVs over 50" on a trail, but keep it closed to
normal street-registered vehicles; in some states, there may also be
implications regarding the requirement to have the vehicle registered as an
OHV, regardless of whether
sent from a phone
> On 1. Sep 2020, at 22:33, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
> OHVs > 50
is there also an upper limit? 50” are 127 cm, so that’s to say wider than a
motorcycle?
Is the question whether “off highway vehicle” would merit its own subclass for
access?
Cheers Martin
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:47 PM John Willis via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I would say that is a “motor_vehecle”
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle
>
Sure, it is a motor_vehicle, but it is just a subset of motor vehicles, so
I don't think that tag would be
I would say that is a “motor_vehecle”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle
Javbw
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 5:33 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
>
>
> In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
> service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway
In specifying access constraints for the roads it manages, the US Forest
service makes a distinction between ATVs, highway vehicles, and "OHVs >
50"."
The first two categories correspond to the tags motorcar=* and atv=* I
think, but I have not been able to find an existing tag that corresponds to
11 matches
Mail list logo
