Re: [Tagging] Parking Lots

2010-05-16 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/5/16 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: +1 I submitted a ticket to revert this change : http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2970 Mapnik cannot display all tags and all information in OSM. Showing all private things will result of an unreadable map. It depends on the way the information is

Re: [Tagging] Parking Lots

2010-05-15 Thread John Smith
On 16 May 2010 03:18, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: 2) We fix the definition of parking and change the renderer. #2 is my favorite solution, as it seems the most right. #3 is my least favorite solution, since it's all high quality data. A slight twist on #2, you add sub-tags.

Re: [Tagging] Parking Lots

2010-05-15 Thread Claudius Henrichs
Am 15.05.2010 19:18, Serge Wroclawski: 2) We fix the definition of parking and change the renderer. Redefining an established tag won't work. How will you ensure that the remaining... hundreds of thousands of occurances of amenity=parking comply to your new definition? So you should

Re: [Tagging] Parking Lots

2010-05-15 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding rendering, two weeks ago, a change was made to the Mapnik rendering: Yeah, I forgot to mention that, since the changeset I applied last night was assuming the old rules. - Serge

Re: [Tagging] Parking Lots

2010-05-15 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Claudius Henrichs claudiu...@gmx.de wrote: Am 15.05.2010 19:18, Serge Wroclawski: 2) We fix the definition of parking and change the renderer. Redefining an established tag won't work. How will you ensure that the remaining... hundreds of thousands of