On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 17:15, Yves via Tagging
wrote:
> It's never to late to fix a mistake?
> Yves
>
> Probably best for that fix to have an approved proposal too to mitigate
the risk of an edit war.
>
> Le 23 octobre 2023 09:46:05 GMT+02:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>>
>>
It's never to late to fix a mistake?
Yves
Le 23 octobre 2023 09:46:05 GMT+02:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>On 22/10/23 19:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 20 Oct 2023, at 10:23, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> maybe just
On 22/10/23 19:56, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 20 Oct 2023, at 10:23, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
wrote:
maybe just removing this bad advise without proposal would be a good idea
+1
___
Issue: that wording is in the
sent from a phone
> On 20 Oct 2023, at 10:23, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> maybe just removing this bad advise without proposal would be a good idea
+1
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 20/10/23 10:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:31 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/10/23 23:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:51 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:31 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 17/10/23 23:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:51 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Presently, it's common for route relations to have
On 18/10/23 19:15, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
Oct 18, 2023, 09:30 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
On 17/10/23 23:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:51 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
Presently,
Oct 18, 2023, 09:30 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> On 17/10/23 23:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at4:51 AM Warin <>> 61sundow...@gmail.com>>
>> >wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>
Presently, it's common
On 17/10/23 23:22, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:51 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
Presently, it's common for route relations to have names that
violate "name is only the name" and "name is not ref" and "name
Oct 17, 2023, 11:49 by 61sundow...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> Presently, it's common for route relations to havenames that violate
>> "name is only the name" and "name is not ref"and "name is not
>> description" rules for name=* tags.
>>
>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:51 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Presently, it's common for route relations to have names that violate
> "name is only the name" and "name is not ref" and "name is not description"
> rules for name=* tags.
>
>
> I
On 17/10/23 04:17, Paul Johnson wrote:
Presently, it's common for route relations to have names that violate
"name is only the name" and "name is not ref" and "name is not
description" rules for name=* tags.
I don't find it common in 'my area' of mapping. One or two examples
would
Presently, it's common for route relations to have names that violate "name
is only the name" and "name is not ref" and "name is not description" rules
for name=* tags.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, 10:24 Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Could you give some more examples to illustrate what the problem is that
>
Could you give some more examples to illustrate what the problem is that
you want to resolve.
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, 00:23 Kevin Kenny, wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 4:50 PM Andrew Hain
> wrote:
>
>> I have started a new proposal: that the name tag should be restricted to
>> the same
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 4:50 PM Andrew Hain
wrote:
> I have started a new proposal: that the name tag should be restricted to
> the same meaning for route relations that it has on other elements and that
> the description tag should be used otherwise.
>
The proposal is unclear and appears to
I have started a new proposal: that the name tag should be restricted to the
same meaning for route relations that it has on other elements and that the
description tag should be used otherwise.
16 matches
Mail list logo
