Wednesday 02 September 2015 13:51:09, André Pirard:
> What policy, what purpose, that's unclear?
> Is OSM.org using that API to display the history on the screen illegal?
> Is Osmose using it to attribute errors to some user illegal?
> Yep, I suppose that making oneself a complete list of OSM
I'm having a deja-vu :-)
Anyone remember the discussion:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-March/016811.html ?
There someone stated that "ground" is too ambiguous in British English:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-March/016836.html
after that I
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:55:14 +0200
"André Pirard" wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 20:12, � wrote :
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:27 +0200
> >> moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 31/08/2015, Mateusz
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:28:08 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing
> > it manually would not be worth the effort. On the
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
> Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing it
> manually would not be worth the effort. On the other hand - running
> script to detect users (and/or relevant changesets) may be a good
On 2015-09-02 08:34, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote :
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:55:14 +0200
"André Pirard" wrote:
On 2015-08-31 20:12, � wrote :
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On 02/09/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 23:55:14 +0200
> "André Pirard" wrote:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node/3157502486/history
>>
>> will return the complete list (history) of authors, changesets and
>> dates
On 2015-08-31 20:12, � wrote :
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:27 +0200
>> moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
>>
>>> On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Is there some method to automate finding who introduced
On 1/09/2015 6:23 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Careful with a mass edit "soil" > "dirt"
Have a look at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirt - note that "soil" is one type of
"dirt" in this article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground, which says that "ground", as
Careful with a mass edit "soil" > "dirt"
Have a look at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirt - note that "soil" is one type of
"dirt" in this article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground, which says that "ground", as surface,
is the same thing as "soil"
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:27 +0200
moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing
> > it manually would not be worth the effort. On the other hand -
> > running
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:27 +0200
> moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
>
> > On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > > Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing
> > > it manually
On 31/08/2015 10:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
duplicate of surface=dirt.
Are you planning to contact the original mappers explaining why, if
they're still using it, using the same tag to represent the same thing
makes
On 31 August 2015 at 11:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
>
> I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
> duplicate of surface=dirt. It is
On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Is there some method to automate finding who introduced tags? Doing it
> manually would not be worth the effort. On the other hand - running
> script to detect users (and/or relevant changesets) may be a good idea.
curl -s
Matthijs Melissen wrote on 2015-08-31 11:47:
On 31 August 2015 at 11:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:35:24 +0100
"ajt1...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
>
> On 31/08/2015 10:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a
> > clear duplicate of surface=dirt.
>
> Are you planning to contact the original mappers
On 31/08/15 11:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:35:24 +0100
"ajt1...@gmail.com" wrote:
There are 32 in the UK, by only 2 mappers (both still active but
edits are from many years ago). Extrapolating that there have only
been probably only 25 mappers
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 7:11 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> Totally agree, I support this edit.
>
> +1, also the definition of 'dirt' should be improved in the wiki (currently
> referring back to 'ground'), and 'soil' should be written into the wiki as
> deprecated
> and
Agree with the edit - change soil to dirt. Soil is a word commonly used for
potting soil in the U.S. You will also sometimes see the phrase "night
soil", an older but once common euphemism for human waste.
FWIW, in my part of the U.S. any road that was unpaved was commonly
referred to as a dirt
20 matches
Mail list logo