On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:16:47AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-04-24 11:01 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
so are you happy that this
http://www.bergsteigen.com/klettersteig/trentino-suedtirol/gardasee-berge/ferrata-rino-pisetta
is tagged as highway=path ?
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:27:23AM +0200, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 24.04.2015 02:16, Warin wrote:
Via ferrata should not be lumped into path or footway .. they are very
significantly different and cannot be used in place of a path or footway.
Would you take a 3 year old along it?
Did
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:57:06AM +0200, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 23.04.2015 11:59, Richard Z. wrote:
there were ongoing discussions concerning this subject so
I have ammended the wiki:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:16:55AM +1000, Warin wrote:
Some minor things ..
overhang ? Should not 'covered' be used?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
overhang here means an additional technical difficulty of the
path.
Key:covered could be used in addition to that.
2015-04-24 11:01 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
so are you happy that this
http://www.bergsteigen.com/klettersteig/trentino-suedtirol/gardasee-berge/ferrata-rino-pisetta
is tagged as highway=path ?
I believe this clearly isn't a path, at least not at the spot you can see
on the
On 24.04.2015 11:01, Richard Z. wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:27:23AM +0200, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 24.04.2015 02:16, Warin wrote:
Via ferrata should not be lumped into path or footway .. they are very
significantly different and cannot be used in place of a path or footway.
Would
On 24.04.2015 05:02, Warin wrote:
The essence of a modern via ferrata is a steel cable which runs along
the route and is periodically (every 3 to 10 metres (9.8 to 32.8 ft))
fixed to the rock.
So you certainly agree that this is safer than an unsecured path.
Nevertheless, a ferrata cannot be
Some minor things ..
overhang ? Should not 'covered' be used?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
Even more trivial ... Oneway .. should include the information that it is on
the direction of the way ... -1 for reverse direction.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
Hi,
there were ongoing discussions concerning this subject so
I have ammended the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata#Criteria_for_taging_as_either_via_ferrata_or_path
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
The ones in Japan ( I have seen) are chains. Some routes are easily passible
without chains, some are beyond vertical in spots with the chain to climb. And
grandpas were climbing them with a pair of gloves.
occasionally there were big anchor rings used as handholds.
For the easier and
On 24.04.2015 02:16, Warin wrote:
Via ferrata should not be lumped into path or footway .. they are very
significantly different and cannot be used in place of a path or footway.
Would you take a 3 year old along it?
Did you read the discussion tab? Farratas are not more difficult nor more
On 23.04.2015 11:59, Richard Z. wrote:
there were ongoing discussions concerning this subject so
I have ammended the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata#Criteria_for_taging_as_either_via_ferrata_or_path
use highway=via_ferrata where people commonly use
On 24/04/2015 12:27 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
On 24.04.2015 02:16, Warin wrote:
Via ferrata should not be lumped into path or footway .. they are very
significantly different and cannot be used in place of a path or footway.
Would you take a 3 year old along it?
Did you read the discussion
13 matches
Mail list logo
