Re: [Tagging] Sidewalk tagged on highway=cycleway
+1
I think this should be tagged with lanes, to be compatible with road lane
tagging:
bicycle:lanes:forward=designated|no
foot:lanes:forward=no|designated
Or if this looks a bit complicated (it does to me) invent a new tag,
something like:
designated:lanes:forward=bicycle|foot
Janko Mihelić
2015-01-01 22:30 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
> +1. I'm also removal. But I can unterstand the idea behind it. However it
> should be discussed some more.
>
> Am 1. Januar 2015 22:09:49 MEZ, schrieb 715371 :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> there is a sentence on
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
>>
>> which says
>>
>> "It is also possible to use {{Tag|sidewalk|right}}/*=left [on
>> highway=cycleway] to indicate which side of the segregated path
>> pedestrians should walk on (where right/left is relative to the way's
>> direction)."
>>
>> It was originally contributed by ulamm and modified by RobJN after a
>> short discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:RobJN).
>> But this is the opposite of what is written on
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
>>
>> "The inclusion of sidewalk information makes it easier to provide
>> effective pedestrian routing, and in particular good narrative
>> descriptions of pedestrian routes along motorised roads. The sidewalk
>> tag is not needed on non-motorised thoroughfares, for example
>> highway=footway/cycleway/path/brideway/track. "
>>
>> I think there better solutions to the problem than ulamm's.
>>
>> If there are no further arguments, I will remove the sentence from the
>> first citation. What is your opinion on that?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tobias
>>
>> --
>>
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Sidewalk tagged on highway=cycleway
+1. I'm also removal. But I can unterstand the idea behind it. However it
should be discussed some more.
Am 1. Januar 2015 22:09:49 MEZ, schrieb 715371 :
>Hi,
>
>there is a sentence on
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
>
>which says
>
>"It is also possible to use {{Tag|sidewalk|right}}/*=left [on
>highway=cycleway] to indicate which side of the segregated path
>pedestrians should walk on (where right/left is relative to the way's
>direction)."
>
>It was originally contributed by ulamm and modified by RobJN after a
>short discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:RobJN).
>But this is the opposite of what is written on
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
>
>"The inclusion of sidewalk information makes it easier to provide
>effective pedestrian routing, and in particular good narrative
>descriptions of pedestrian routes along motorised roads. The sidewalk
>tag is not needed on non-motorised thoroughfares, for example
>highway=footway/cycleway/path/brideway/track. "
>
>I think there better solutions to the problem than ulamm's.
>
>If there are no further arguments, I will remove the sentence from the
>first citation. What is your opinion on that?
>
>Cheers
>Tobias
>
>___
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Sidewalk tagged on highway=cycleway
I support revert of ulamm's edit.
2015-01-01 22:09 GMT+01:00 715371 :
> Hi,
>
> there is a sentence on
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
>
> which says
>
> "It is also possible to use {{Tag|sidewalk|right}}/*=left [on
> highway=cycleway] to indicate which side of the segregated path
> pedestrians should walk on (where right/left is relative to the way's
> direction)."
>
> It was originally contributed by ulamm and modified by RobJN after a
> short discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:RobJN).
> But this is the opposite of what is written on
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
>
> "The inclusion of sidewalk information makes it easier to provide
> effective pedestrian routing, and in particular good narrative
> descriptions of pedestrian routes along motorised roads. The sidewalk
> tag is not needed on non-motorised thoroughfares, for example
> highway=footway/cycleway/path/brideway/track. "
>
> I think there better solutions to the problem than ulamm's.
>
> If there are no further arguments, I will remove the sentence from the
> first citation. What is your opinion on that?
>
> Cheers
> Tobias
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Sidewalk tagged on highway=cycleway
Hi,
there is a sentence on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
which says
"It is also possible to use {{Tag|sidewalk|right}}/*=left [on
highway=cycleway] to indicate which side of the segregated path
pedestrians should walk on (where right/left is relative to the way's
direction)."
It was originally contributed by ulamm and modified by RobJN after a
short discussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:RobJN).
But this is the opposite of what is written on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
"The inclusion of sidewalk information makes it easier to provide
effective pedestrian routing, and in particular good narrative
descriptions of pedestrian routes along motorised roads. The sidewalk
tag is not needed on non-motorised thoroughfares, for example
highway=footway/cycleway/path/brideway/track. "
I think there better solutions to the problem than ulamm's.
If there are no further arguments, I will remove the sentence from the
first citation. What is your opinion on that?
Cheers
Tobias
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
