On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Kieron Thwaites
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently passed through an intersection in a particularly dodgy part
> of town that actually had warning signs up, warning motorists that
> said intersection is a hotspot for "smash and grab"
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:24:13 +0200
Kieron Thwaites wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently passed through an intersection in a particularly dodgy part
> of town that actually had warning signs up, warning motorists that
> said intersection is a hotspot for "smash and grab"
On 2015-11-10 10:24, Kieron Thwaites wrote :
> Hi,
>
> I recently passed through an intersection in a particularly dodgy part
> of town that actually had warning signs up, warning motorists that
> said intersection is a hotspot for "smash and grab" robberies. (If
> anyone is interested, it's on
Hi,
I recently passed through an intersection in a particularly dodgy part
of town that actually had warning signs up, warning motorists that
said intersection is a hotspot for "smash and grab" robberies. (If
anyone is interested, it's on Google Streetview too:
https://goo.gl/maps/kYkdMR9Kmpk)
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:15 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> For start, traffic sign itself may be also mapped. It would also make
> clear that hazard (or other method to tag this) is based on something
> verifiable, not opinion of the mapper.
Sounds like a similar
The situation you describe is a social hazard, and if continued it
would lead to mapping social hotspots in general, which would be
a very controversial issue, that could be seen as discrimination
by people living there.
In larger towns you see lots of warnings, e.g. pickpocketing in
crowded