On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:46:42PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2017-01-09 13:15 GMT+01:00 ael :
> (relatively recently). For many years, OSM didn't have a way to map bridges
> and was relying on indirect mapping methods (state on a highway or railway
> that it runs on a bridge, the bridge=y
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:46:42PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2017-01-09 13:15 GMT+01:00 ael :
>
> > This thread has reminded me that I have encountered problems with
> > mapping disused quarries and surface mining.
> >
> > The quarries that I have in mind are major geographical features
2017-01-09 13:15 GMT+01:00 ael :
> This thread has reminded me that I have encountered problems with
> mapping disused quarries and surface mining.
>
> The quarries that I have in mind are major geographical features - they
> have not been filled in. I tried tagging them as landuse=quarry and
> di
On 10.01.2017 10:47, Zecke wrote:
Artificial rock faces in quarries and open pit mines, called berms,
are created due to blasting. The faces are typically inclined 60-70°
with drops of max. a few tenth of meters. This fundamental difference
might be best taken into account by using man_made=emb
I have locally many near vertical exposed rock features of which even
locals don't know if they are man-made or natural. In reality they are all
man-made, but some date probably back to the Roman Empire. With other
words, this discussion is sterile.
On 10 Jan 2017 10:49 a.m., "Zecke" wrote:
>
>
Artificial rock faces in quarries and open pit mines, called berms,
are created due to blasting. The faces are typically inclined 60-70°
with drops of max. a few tenth of meters. This fundamental difference
might be best taken into account by using man_made=embankment for these.
I have to co
> Am 10.01.2017 um 00:04 schrieb Tom Pfeifer :
>
> They consist of the remaining geological material, which is of natural origin.
For the remaining exposed rock we use mainly natural=bare_rock.
>
> There is a geological cycle as well, with mountains moving up and down,
> continents sink or li
On 09/01/2017 20:56, ksg wrote:
Am 09.01.2017 um 21:23 schrieb ael :
It is perfectly clear in
the case of a disused quarry. It is still a quarry. But it is no longer
in use. In a few cases it may have a new purpose, but it is still a
quarry in any normal sense.
No, if there there no more min
On 09.01.2017 22:56, ksg wrote:
Am 09.01.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
On 10-Jan-17 07:56 AM, ksg wrote:
You might use man_made=embankment for them. Don’t use natural=cliff, as these
features are not of natural origin.
The 'natural' key is used for both 'natural' a
> Am 09.01.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> On 10-Jan-17 07:56 AM, ksg wrote:
>>>
>> You might use man_made=embankment for them. Don’t use natural=cliff, as
>> these features are not of natural origin.
>
> The 'natural' key is used for both 'natural' and 'unnatural' obj
On 09.01.2017 21:23, ael wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
On 09.01.2017 13:15, ael wrote:
Please do not use "disused=yes" as it is considered troll-tagging, first
saying it is simething, and in the next line negating it.
I don't think that is a natural interp
On 10-Jan-17 07:56 AM, ksg wrote:
Am 09.01.2017 um 21:23 schrieb ael :
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Please do not use "disused=yes" as it is considered troll-tagging, first
saying it is simething, and in the next line negating it.
+1 That’s what the life cycle p
> Am 09.01.2017 um 21:23 schrieb ael :
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>> Please do not use "disused=yes" as it is considered troll-tagging, first
>> saying it is simething, and in the next line negating it.
+1 That’s what the life cycle prefix is intended for.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 02:00:58PM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> On 09.01.2017 13:15, ael wrote:
> Please do not use "disused=yes" as it is considered troll-tagging, first
> saying it is simething, and in the next line negating it.
I don't think that is a natural interpretation. It is perfectly clea
On 10-Jan-17 12:00 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
On 09.01.2017 13:15, ael wrote:
This thread has reminded me that I have encountered problems with
mapping disused quarries and surface mining.
The quarries that I have in mind are major geographical features - they
have not been filled in. I tried taggi
On 09.01.2017 13:15, ael wrote:
This thread has reminded me that I have encountered problems with
mapping disused quarries and surface mining.
The quarries that I have in mind are major geographical features - they
have not been filled in. I tried tagging them as landuse=quarry and
disused=yes.
This thread has reminded me that I have encountered problems with
mapping disused quarries and surface mining.
The quarries that I have in mind are major geographical features - they
have not been filled in. I tried tagging them as landuse=quarry and
disused=yes. If landuse really does mean curren
17 matches
Mail list logo
