sri, 29. tra 2015. 18:32 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com je napisao:
In the case of a mangrove forest, it means
exactly what it seems like: there is
no other land type between forest and water.
I think you should map a mangrove forest over the water, if tree trunks are
sticking out
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
So are the tree trunks growing
right at the coastline, or is there a 1m-5m zone where there are no
tree trunks and you are really mapping landcover=tree_canopy? So I've
never really figured it out exactly what it means
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø
torstein...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Some island are covered completely with wood. For these island I get a tag
conflict. Since the natural tag is used for both. I have two solutions:
1. make a combined tag like natural=coastline;wood
2.
2015-04-26 18:58 GMT+02:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
I would go with a relation or even landcover=* and not natural=wood at
all together with coastline.
+1, I would make a multipolygon relation with the coastline way(s) as outer
member(s), and add natural=wood (if applicable) and
Hi,
Some island are covered completely with wood. For these island I get a tag
conflict. Since the natural tag is used for both. I have two solutions:
1. make a combined tag like natural=coastline;wood
2. make a 1-way relation for the wood tag and tag the way with
natural=coastline
which one is
The first one is a no-no in my opinion. natural=coastline has a rather
special way of being used, not good to encumber it with a
semicolon-notation. My preference would be to have two separate ways,
both using the same nodes.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø
