Re: [Tagging] Wood+Coastline conflict
sri, 29. tra 2015. 18:32 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com je napisao: In the case of a mangrove forest, it means exactly what it seems like: there is no other land type between forest and water. I think you should map a mangrove forest over the water, if tree trunks are sticking out of water. Janko ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Wood+Coastline conflict
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote: So are the tree trunks growing right at the coastline, or is there a 1m-5m zone where there are no tree trunks and you are really mapping landcover=tree_canopy? So I've never really figured it out exactly what it means when the coastline and the treeline shares the same way. In the case of a mangrove forest, it means exactly what it seems like: there is no other land type between forest and water. In other cases it's a handy approximation, close enough for mapping purposes. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Wood+Coastline conflict
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø torstein...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Some island are covered completely with wood. For these island I get a tag conflict. Since the natural tag is used for both. I have two solutions: 1. make a combined tag like natural=coastline;wood 2. make a 1-way relation for the wood tag and tag the way with natural=coastline which one is prefered? To keep my blood pressure low I do not map trees on islands at least in the current OSM datamodel. There are two cases the whole islands is filled with trees, and the islands is partially filled with trees. So are the tree trunks growing right at the coastline, or is there a 1m-5m zone where there are no tree trunks and you are really mapping landcover=tree_canopy? So I've never really figured it out exactly what it means when the coastline and the treeline shares the same way. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Wood+Coastline conflict
2015-04-26 18:58 GMT+02:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com: I would go with a relation or even landcover=* and not natural=wood at all together with coastline. +1, I would make a multipolygon relation with the coastline way(s) as outer member(s), and add natural=wood (if applicable) and landcover=trees to the relation. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Wood+Coastline conflict
Hi, Some island are covered completely with wood. For these island I get a tag conflict. Since the natural tag is used for both. I have two solutions: 1. make a combined tag like natural=coastline;wood 2. make a 1-way relation for the wood tag and tag the way with natural=coastline which one is prefered? Best regards tibnor ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Wood+Coastline conflict
The first one is a no-no in my opinion. natural=coastline has a rather special way of being used, not good to encumber it with a semicolon-notation. My preference would be to have two separate ways, both using the same nodes. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø torstein...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Some island are covered completely with wood. For these island I get a tag conflict. Since the natural tag is used for both. I have two solutions: 1. make a combined tag like natural=coastline;wood 2. make a 1-way relation for the wood tag and tag the way with natural=coastline which one is prefered? Best regards tibnor ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
