On 20/07/18 15:40, Marc Gemis wrote:
building=clubhouse is fine as value, unless
- the club is located in a pub (e.g. darts, pools, biljarts)
- the club is located in the former barn of a farm (e.g. old timer
(car) club I know).
- perhaps building=civic when the club is located in a town hall o
building=clubhouse is fine as value, unless
- the club is located in a pub (e.g. darts, pools, biljarts)
- the club is located in the former barn of a farm (e.g. old timer
(car) club I know).
- perhaps building=civic when the club is located in a town hall or so.
there are probably other examples
On 19/07/18 18:20, Tobias Knerr wrote:
On 19.07.2018 05:15, Warin wrote:
Would it not be best to combine all theses into building=clubhouse?
I'm not opposed to the general idea of having a sport-independent tag
for clubhouses, if we can agree on a suitable tag. However, please
remember that th
Of course a club is free to declare any building as their "clubhome".
But (as I see it), it is that building where members meet and can
perhaps drink or eat something. In case there are multiple buildings,
it is not the one were they store material to maintain the grounds,
nor the one in which they
On 19 July 2018 at 13:52, Marc Gemis wrote:
> for the complete "base" of the club, the club page [1] recommends
>
> "The base of the club can be tagged amenity=community_centre with the
> type community_centre=club_home and possibly the target group
> community_centre:for=*; either on the contain
sent from a phone
> On 19. Jul 2018, at 19:14, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> When is something a clubhouse?
This is up to the club to decide/declare
> What if some functionality is in a separate building, e.g. dressing room or
> showers? Is that separate building still a clubhouse or even leisu
What is the difference between this leisure and the one I mentioned earlier
(via community_center)? Does this one only go on the building?
When is something a clubhouse? What if some functionality is in a separate
building, e.g. dressing room or showers? Is that separate building still
a clubhou
sent from a phone
> On 19. Jul 2018, at 10:20, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>
> However, please remember that the value of building=* does _not_
> indicate what the building is used for. So I don't think it's a good
> choice for this purpose.
+1
What about leisure=clubhouse?
I would expect clubhouse
On 19.07.2018 05:15, Warin wrote:
> Would it not be best to combine all theses into building=clubhouse?
I'm not opposed to the general idea of having a sport-independent tag
for clubhouses, if we can agree on a suitable tag.
However, please remember that the value of building=* does _not_
indicat
On 19/07/18 15:10, Marc Gemis wrote:
I just wanted to point out that there are multiple levels that have to
be mapped.
- the golf course ( this does not include buildings, parkings, ...)
- the buildings (some of which are clubhouses (can also be sheds, ...))
- the sport complex as a whole (the
] building=clubhouse
I just wanted to point out that there are multiple levels that have to be
mapped.
- the golf course ( this does not include buildings, parkings, ...)
- the buildings (some of which are clubhouses (can also be sheds, ...))
- the sport complex as a whole (the course + parking
I just wanted to point out that there are multiple levels that have to be
mapped.
- the golf course ( this does not include buildings, parkings, ...)
- the buildings (some of which are clubhouses (can also be sheds, ...))
- the sport complex as a whole (the course + parking + buildings)
(leisure=g
On 19/07/18 13:52, Marc Gemis wrote:
for the complete "base" of the club, the club page [1] recommends "The
base of the club can be tagged amenity=community_centre with the type
community_centre=club_home and possibly the target group
community_centre:for=*; either on the containing building or
for the complete "base" of the club, the club page [1] recommends
"The base of the club can be tagged amenity=community_centre with the
type community_centre=club_home and possibly the target group
community_centre:for=*; either on the containing building or the same
element as the club itself."
Sounds like something that could be tagged *in addition* to building=clubhouse
to provide more detail?
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Thursday, 19 July 2018 13:41
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=clubhouse
Not exactly clubhouse as such but
On 19 July 2018 at 13:15, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the golfing thing that I have on another thread there is the tagging
> of golf=clubhouse suggested on a building=yes. That is specific to golf,
> what about other clubhouses?
>
>
> That is some 1,200 uses. Not vast by an
Hi,
With the golfing thing that I have on another thread there is the
tagging of golf=clubhouse suggested on a building=yes. That is specific
to golf, what about other clubhouses?
Taginfo has uses of
557 building=clubhouse
479 golf=clubhouse
121 tennis:clubhouse=*
98 amenity=clubhouse
9
17 matches
Mail list logo
