I also support that mass retagging of building=entrance nodes attached to
buildings.
--
Andrew
From: Martin Koppenhoefer
Sent: 13 December 2022 00:26
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=entrance
sent from a phone
sent from a phone
> On 12 Dec 2022, at 22:13, Marc_marc wrote:
>
> i dislike the idea to have tag with several meaning depending
> if it's on a node or a closed way
One could say the distinction is in the meaning, not in the object type,
there is a tag that was used in the past on nodes
Le 12.12.22 à 20:27, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
it doesn't look like to be a building but a indoor=* (root ? entrance ?)
and sometime a building:part (for 3D tag)
i
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:51 PM Jmapb wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
> > using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
> >
> > It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so
On 12/12/2022 2:28 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is
using building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so there
is not much hindering people from using it, just that
sorry, missed the link https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22570
any comments on the tag? Someone else using it for buildings?
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Following a JOSM discussion I wanted to ask here, if someone else is using
building=entrance to tag entrance buildings.
It is a term that seems well introduced and understandable, so there is not
much hindering people from using it, just that there was the bad practice
to use the same tag on
