Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

Den 18.02.2016 12.21, skrev Martin Koppenhoefer: "When the structure is made from steel or concrete, it is not a tower, it could be a mast though" (maybe not the best example). yes, clearly not the best example ;-) It's quite obvious that "steel and concrete" can be safely removed

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

2016-02-18 11:40 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > I would like to see something > > "When the structure is fastened with guy wires, you can map it as > mast. It is not a tower in this case". > this is not completely clear, it seems that there are some towers that are fastened with

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

On 18/02/2016 9:40 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: "High masts may be fastened to ground with guy wires." actually any mast may be fastened to the ground by guy wires, also low ones. I propose to remove the word

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > "High masts may be fastened to ground with guy wires." > > actually any mast may be fastened to the ground by guy wires, also low ones. > I propose to remove the word "high". Does "Masts may be fastened to

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

2016-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast >> >> > > > really, this is what I was writing about. You have asked, so here we go: > it does define some

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

2016-02-17 22:05 GMT+01:00 Marc Zoutendijk : > Generally, when the definitions in OSM are different from what a person > speaking the language might expect, it doesn't work. The issue here: > "small" "a few meters high" seems not pertinent for radio masts which are > among

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

> Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:42:55 +0100 > From: Marc Zoutendijk <marczoutend...@mac.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

Is the problem here basically one of rendering? A man_made mast can have many functions, whether guyed or not, and those functions can be further specified in subservient tags. If the next tag is mast=lighting or mast:type=lighting this can be shown with a proper icon. Similarly for

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

> On 17 feb. 2016, at 21:22 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Generally, when the definitions in OSM are different from what a person > speaking the language might expect, it doesn't work. The issue here: > "small" "a few meters high" seems not pertinent for radio masts which are > among the

Re: [Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

2016-02-17 15:42 GMT+01:00 Marc Zoutendijk : > "A man_made=mast is usually a small tower of only a few meters height. It > is often built from concrete or steel and only for a single application > like a mobile phone base station." Generally, when the definitions in OSM

[Tagging] man_made=mast for non communication uses?

Hi all, Currently man_made=mast has this wiki description: "A man_made=mast is usually a small tower of only a few meters height. It is often built from concrete or steel and only for a single application like a mobile phone base station." The part "only for a single application" almost