Am Do., 19. Sept. 2019 um 09:20 Uhr schrieb Valor Naram via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> Let me summarize
>
> Why `phone`:
> - It's more used
> - It's shorter
> - Better to find in wiki
>
> Why `contact:phone`:
> - It's more structured because it's a subkey of `contact`
> - It's better
ved oneBoth let us add more subkeys like `emergency`CheerioSören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purposeFrom: Colin Smale To: tagging@openstreetmap.orgCC:
On 2019-08-26 15:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wr
I've yet to see an argument for collecting all under the 'contact:*' tag
that bears scrutiny .
The "group them without having to keep a hardcoded list" falls down as
they have to be split into separate variables to make sense of them.
DaveF
On 25/08/2019 20:48, marc marc wrote:
Le 25.08.19
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 21:48, marc marc wrote:
>
> we need to switch all contact to key with contact: prefix
> (pro : a datauser is able to group them without havng to keep
> a hardcoded list of all key (phone, fax, email, web, social network )
> and update to list everytime
On 2019-08-26 15:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 18:06, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> there are at least two possibilities:
> phone=
> phone:emergency=
> phone:staff=
>
> and:
> phone=
> emergency:phone=
> staff:phone=
>
> Neither of which requires "contac
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 18:06, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> there are at least two possibilities:
>
>
> phone=
> phone:emergency=
> phone:staff=
>
> and:
>
> phone=
> emergency:phone=
> staff:phone=
>
> Neither of which requires "contact:"
exactly, I was about to reply the sa
On 26/08/19 05:48, marc marc wrote:
Le 25.08.19 à 16:55, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
What about deprecating the contact: prefix, at least for phone?
not "AT LEAST FOR" that's the main issue !
having some contact with contact: prefix and some other without
is a very bad idea.
we need to switc
On 26/08/19 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 25. Aug 2019, at 07:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Type 'phone' into the OSMwiki search box and you get redirected to the key
'phone=*'.
This gets preferential treatment to the key 'contact:phone=*'.
seems fair th
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 05:58, marc marc wrote:
>
> phone=number1;number2
> ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26861282
But that wouldn't allow you to specify what the different numbers are for,
would it?
eg phone=general_enquiries:number1;service:number2
Thanks
Graeme
_
Le 25.08.19 à 17:42, Colin Smale a écrit :
> Your model (using only phone=*) only allows an object to have a single
> phone number.
not true.
phone=number1;number2
ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26861282
18219 discint value for a total of 19694 count
> one for general enquiries, one for e
Le 25.08.19 à 16:55, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> What about deprecating the contact: prefix, at least for phone?
not "AT LEAST FOR" that's the main issue !
having some contact with contact: prefix and some other without
is a very bad idea.
we need to switch all contact to key with contact: pr
August 2019 17:40
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one
purpose
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact don't provide any tagging
method to tag number
fragmentation" in general. But deprecating `contact:phone` in favor of `phone` can be the logical step.CheersSören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message ----Subject: Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purposeFrom: Colin Smale To: tagging@ope
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 16:42, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> Your model (using only phone=*) only allows an object to have a single phone
> number. How do you propose modelling multiple phone numbers on a single
> object? For example, one for general enquiries, one for emergencies, one for
> staff,...
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 16:46, Colin Smale wrote:
> Your model (using only phone=*) only allows an object to have a single
> phone number. How do you propose modelling multiple phone numbers on a
> single object? For example, one for general enquiries, one for emergencies,
> one for staff,...
>
I
recating `contact:phone`
>
> Original Message ----
> Subject: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one
> purpose
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> CC:
>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>&
> What about deprecating the contact: prefix, at least for phone? It doesn’t seem it will ever make it and is basically a deliberate tag fragmentation.Yes, I recommend deprecating `contact:phone` Original Message Subject: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags
sent from a phone
> On 25. Aug 2019, at 07:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Type 'phone' into the OSMwiki search box and you get redirected to the key
> 'phone=*'.
> This gets preferential treatment to the key 'contact:phone=*'.
seems fair that “key:phone” shows up first for a se
18 matches
Mail list logo
