I appreciate amenity=place_of_mourning.
tom
On 09.11.2020 10:15, woll...@posteo.de wrote:
OK, so I haven't really done all the counting, but my impression is that amenity=place_of_mourning
has quite some fans while most of the others are at least able to swallow it.
Unless anyone explains me
OK, so I haven't really done all the counting, but my impression is that
amenity=place_of_mourning has quite some fans while most of the others
are at least able to swallow it.
Unless anyone explains me that I got that wrong, I think I'll move the
proposal there then.
Am 05.11.2020 09:43
On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 14:26, Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> I note that "visitation room" is a term that describes "A room designated
> in the funeral home for the deceased to lie before the funeral so that
> people can view the deceased."
>
I hadn't come across the term in the UK, but that
I note that "visitation room" is a term that describes "A room designated
in the funeral home for the deceased to lie before the funeral so that
people can view the deceased." Conveniently, it carries no religious
connotation.
Some cursory searching indicates that this term is in use both in the
I agree that my examples are outliers in the key. However, I was pointing
out the existence of a small collection of outliers for cases where the
*place* was too hard to describe and therefore the *thing *or *service *was
described instead. So if we find ourselves in the position where the place
sent from a phone
> On 5. Nov 2020, at 16:47, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
>
> We use amenity=ice_cream and not amenity=ice_cream_parlor, because "ice
> cream" is the amenity being offered.
ice cream is more outlier than regular though. And amenity=ice_cream is not
just for ice cream
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 18:56, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> I'm not able to find any website which clearly talks about a specific
> "mourning room", though it is certainly documented that the front room of a
> house, often known as a "parlour" at the time, would be used to view the
> corpse of a
In Nederland it is a normal option to arrange a temporary mourning room
("rouwkamer") in the house. Any room could be used. I don't think this counts
as a mappable amenity. Most people, though, use a permanent mourning facility,
usually with several viewing/mourning rooms because people do not
That is clear and unambiguous terminology that is not religion-specific. I
would support this.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020, 2:10 PM António Madeira via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> In many modern places near cemeteries there's not a room, but several.
> So, I would prefer
In many modern places near cemeteries there's not a room, but several.
So, I would prefer amenity=place_of_mourning
Às 12:39 de 05/11/2020, Peter Elderson escreveu:
rate the following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"?
amenity=mourning
acceptable, though I think an
I'm not able to find any website which clearly talks about a specific
"mourning room", though it is certainly documented that the front room of a
house, often known as a "parlour" at the time, would be used to view the
corpse of a deceased family member. This practice is still common in
Southeast
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 18:19, Steve Doerr wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:14 PM Paul Allen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:46, wrote:
>>
>>>
>
>> amenity=mourning_room
>>>
>>
>> Unacceptable. "Mourning room" was the old name for what is now
>> known as a "living room" (and was also
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:14 PM Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:46, wrote:
>
>>
> amenity=mourning_room
>>
>
> Unacceptable. "Mourning room" was the old name for what is now
> known as a "living room" (and was also known as a "parlour"), A
> room in somebody's house which was
>
>
> amenity=deceased_viewing
>>
>
> That almost works. But it's a verb not a noun, an activity not a place.
> With additional words it could work, but it would be rather inelegantly
> named.
>
We use amenity=ice_cream and not amenity=ice_cream_parlor, because "ice
cream" is the amenity being
> rate the following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"?
>
> amenity=mourning
>
acceptable, though I think an amenity should be a feature, not an activity
> amenity=place_of_mourning
>
favourable. Secondary tags could add details if necessary
> amenity=mourning_room
>
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:46, wrote:
>
> amenity=mourning
>
Barely acceptable. It's a verb not a noun, an activity not a place.
amenity=place_of_mourning
>
Acceptable. Some would say mourning could happen anywhere, and
not necessarily for the dead. But those people miss an important
fact
Nov 5, 2020, 09:43 by woll...@posteo.de:
> Thanks for all the interventions.
>
> To avoid that the discussion becomes inconclusive again, could everybody rate
> the following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"?
>
> amenity=mourning
>
unfavourable (unclear)
>
woll...@posteo.de:
Thanks for all the interventions.
To avoid that the discussion becomes inconclusive again, could everybody rate the
following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"?
amenity=mourning
favorable
amenity=place_of_mourning
amenity=mourning_room
acceptable
All of these would be acceptable to me - Preference from highest to lowest:
amenity=deceased_viewing
amenity=viewing_arrangements
amenity=place_of_mourning
amenity=mourning_room
amenity=mourning
Rob
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 19:45, wrote:
> Thanks for all the interventions.
>
> To avoid that the
Thanks for all the interventions.
To avoid that the discussion becomes inconclusive again, could everybody
rate the following "favourable", "acceptable" or "unfavourable"?
amenity=mourning
amenity=place_of_mourning
amenity=mourning_room
amenity=viewing_arrangements
amenity=deceased_viewing
20 matches
Mail list logo
