Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

sent from a phone > On 26. Jan 2018, at 00:57, Fernando Trebien > wrote: > > Change the tag "type" to > anything else and you'll still get a warning saying that "route" is > not an expected role. is there docu about role “route” ? If this is established you

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Dave F wrote: > The links he provides do not "suggest that such role should not be used." > The description in [2] is giving clear instruction where 'forward/backward' > roles > *can* be used. > He says "The role is missing" from [2].

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

On 25/01/2018 21:16, Fernando Trebien wrote: Then please say so in the public mailing list and let's see other people's answers. OK Synopsis of my private conversation with Fernanado: The links he provides do not "suggest that such role should not be used." The description in [2] is giving

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Fernando Trebien < fernando.treb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Jo wrote: > >> > >> I fail to understand what information the route role is

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Jo wrote: >> >> I fail to understand what information the route role is supposed to add. > > Identify "on/off ramp" connections on cycleways and multi-use paths that >

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Jo wrote: > I fail to understand what information the route role is supposed to add. > Identify "on/off ramp" connections on cycleways and multi-use paths that have a "bicycle superhighway" configuration. > I never needed a link role in

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

Then is there any type of route this role adds anything to? On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Jo wrote: > I fail to understand what information the route role is supposed to add. > > I never needed a link role in bicycle or hiking route relations, it seems > something to use

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

I fail to understand what information the route role is supposed to add. I never needed a link role in bicycle or hiking route relations, it seems something to use on route=road relations. Polyglot 2018-01-11 19:35 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien : > The validator also

Re: [Tagging] route role on cycle routes

The validator also issues a warning when using the link role on cycle routes. The role is defined on the main article [2] but not mentioned on the more specific article [3]. On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Fernando Trebien wrote: > Iterating on the previous related

[Tagging] route role on cycle routes

Iterating on the previous related discussion [1], I've noticed that, though the main article on route relations [2] claims that the route role can be used, the article on cycle routes [3] seems to suggest that such role should not be used. JOSM issues a warning if it is used, and most routes I'm