Steve Bennett writes:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> Wikipedia is clearly different from OSM in that there is exactly one
>> relevant way of viewing a Wikipedia entry: Visiting the page on
>> wikipedia.org. Everything else is an afterthought, used by a small
>> minority
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> >
> > I would suggest a good one to
> > choose is whatever Wikipedia (ironically enough) chooses as its
> > primary image for the topic, where known.
>
> In this case, what you're really t
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> I would suggest a good one to
> choose is whatever Wikipedia (ironically enough) chooses as its
> primary image for the topic, where known.
In this case, what you're really tagging is image_that_wikipedia_shows=*.
In which case, you might
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Wikipedia is clearly different from OSM in that there is exactly one
> relevant way of viewing a Wikipedia entry: Visiting the page on
> wikipedia.org. Everything else is an afterthought, used by a small
> minority of Wikipedia visitors.
You'r
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
> ... Yes, there can only be one photo to represent
> the OSM object.
Why? You could just as easily use image=;;..., though this
clearly doesn't scale well (which may suggest that this isn't a good
approach...)
I think what Tobias is getting a
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> There are conceptual differences between WP and OSM, but the underlying
> problem stays the same. Choose one "prominent" photo representing the
> object. WP can do it, so I don't see a good reason why we can't.
Of course we can. I'm just trying to explain that this problem i
Am 06.02.2010 17:38, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
> Ulf Lamping schrieb:
>> Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
>>> Sam Vekemans wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
>>> The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
>>> the several images that likely exist
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
> Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
>> Sam Vekemans wrote:
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
>> The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
>> the several images that likely exist for most objects should be
>> referenced. And I e
I updated the wiki page and put in a photo
:)
Ie. for a bikeshop, we add in the phone number and their website, as well as
their post-code, and the name translated to other languages) all of which
are invisible.
So we can also add in a url of the photo link, so then all the details are
available
Ulf Lamping writes:
> Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
>
>> My opinion is that personal preferences like that shouldn't be part of
>> the OSM database. No "my favourite Sunday walk" route relations, no
>> subjective "food=extremely_tasty" for restaurants, and no "my favourite
>> image o
Am 05.02.2010 12:26, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
> Sam Vekemans wrote:
>> I edited the page 'image'
>> feel free to fix / edit/ delete
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
>
> The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
> the several images that likely exist for mos
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Dave F. wrote:
> Tobias Knerr wrote:
> > Sam Vekemans wrote:
> >
> >> I edited the page 'image'
> >> feel free to fix / edit/ delete
> >>
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
> >>
> >
> > The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition whic
Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Sam Vekemans wrote:
>
>> I edited the page 'image'
>> feel free to fix / edit/ delete
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
>>
>
> The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
> the several images that likely exist for most objects
Sam Vekemans wrote:
> I edited the page 'image'
> feel free to fix / edit/ delete
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
The problem with this proposal is that there isn't a definition which of
the several images that likely exist for most objects should be
referenced. And I expect that it
Sure, the OSM poi KML script can handle all variations.
The point is, is to find 1 that people are happy with, and market it
out there to all the 'map editoring tools' so they all will support
it.
"osv:url=http:// .jpg" is another one.
When people are out there 'photo mapping' why not share
On 5 February 2010 15:00, Sam Vekemans wrote:
> Hi,
> I edited the page 'image'
> feel free to fix / edit/ delete
There seems to be a number of URL type tags, is there a need for a
specific image tag? Wouldn't it be better to unify these?
eg
URI:image=*
URI:wikipedia=*
URI:website=*
__
Hi,
I edited the page 'image'
feel free to fix / edit/ delete
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image
cheers,
sam
P.S. the page fo the google earth OpenStreetMap POI kml isnt made yet, nor
is the one showing how to get the Google Earth kml OpenStreetMap layers.
.. as long as it clearly list
17 matches
Mail list logo
