On 18/04/2016 9:33 PM, Mikael Nordfeldth wrote:
Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com wrote:
That has "Shot-put" ... note the dash, not an uderscore. So I am back
to thinking about it.
Hi again! As I commented on the wiki talk page for "sport=shot-put"[1] I
believe the value should be normalised to
Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com wrote:
> That has "Shot-put" ... note the dash, not an uderscore. So I am back
> to thinking about it.
Hi again! As I commented on the wiki talk page for "sport=shot-put"[1] I
believe the value should be normalised to "shot_put" regardless if it's
the English
On 6/04/2016 10:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2016-04-06 11:43 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer >:
Please remembers these keys and values on tags are computer variables,
not linguistic subtleties.
They are often influenced by the
2016-04-06 11:43 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer :
> Please remembers these keys and values on tags are computer variables,
> not linguistic subtleties.
>
> They are often influenced by the people who introduced them.
> I see no value in being overly nitpicking here.
>
yes, it
Warin wrote on 2016/04/06 02:44:
I have just bought a new large Dictionary .. A 'Macquarie' .. about 1,500 A4
pages, it is not the latest not their 'gold plated version' (that would cost
several hundred dollars).
That has "Shot-put" ... note the dash, not an uderscore. So I am back to
On 29/03/2016 9:29 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/28 23:15:
I would map each sport as individual pitches/tracks (running is a
track type thing).
> Then add the relevant sport to the individual pitch/track. That way
I can 'see' where each sport is.
So what do you do when
On 29/03/2016 7:21 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 13:24 +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Yes and for good reason. Soccer and American Football are comnpletly
different sports,
and have completely different pitches.
Yes, they are completely different sports, but I've seen the same
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good, one thing we agree on.
>
> Yay. I note 'we' are the only two participants. Such is voluntary democracy.
> Anyone else want to give some support one way of the other??
It started out as a question on spelling for a tag:
A sample ...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-28.23560/153.56404
Has;
running track
discus/hammer throws
football
hockey
jumping
cricket
bowels
All individually entered and enclosed in a landuse=recreation_ground.
On 29/03/2016 9:29 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/28
On 29/03/2016 9:29 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/28 23:15:
I would map each sport as individual pitches/tracks (running is a
track type thing).
> Then add the relevant sport to the individual pitch/track. That way
I can 'see' where each sport is.
So what do you do when
Warin wrote on 2016/03/28 23:15:
I would map each sport as individual pitches/tracks (running is a track type
thing).
> Then add the relevant sport to the individual pitch/track. That way I can
'see' where each sport is.
So what do you do when multiple athletic disciplines are performed on
On 29/03/2016 5:53 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/28 00:21:
Athletics is another case where multiple disciplines are performed
on the same pitch/track.
No!
Running sports have a particular track, not used for shot put,
hammer, discus, long jump etc etc.
I don't think long
Warin wrote on 2016/03/28 00:21:
Athletics is another case where multiple disciplines are performed on the same
pitch/track.
No!
Running sports have a particular track, not used for shot put, hammer, discus,
long jump etc etc.
I don't think long jump pitches are not used for any other
On 27/03/2016 10:24 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/27 12:09:
Correct. But the wiki page for Athletics has no way of
noting/adding/separating the various sports. And I think it too will
fail due to anyway a mapper can see to map the individual sports. In
fact the wiki page on
Warin wrote on 2016/03/27 12:09:
Correct. But the wiki page for Athletics has no way of noting/adding/separating
the various sports. And I think it too will fail due to anyway a mapper can
see to map the individual sports. In fact the wiki page on athletics in sparse
on information as
to
On 26/03/2016 12:58 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 23:07:
On 25/03/2016 9:16 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I prefer to tag all those as
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 23:07:
On 25/03/2016 9:16 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I prefer to tag all those as sport=athletics, as well as the tracks for
long-jump
On 25/03/2016 9:16 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
Hi,
Both sport=shotput and sport=shot_put exist in the data base with
about the same numbers .. about 50 each.
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
Hi,
Both sport=shotput and sport=shot_put exist in the data base with about the
same numbers .. about 50 each.
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I prefer to tag all those as sport=athletics,
Hi,
Both sport=shotput and sport=shot_put exist in the data base with about
the same numbers .. about 50 each.
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
(Why am I asking.. I have add some .. but there is no guidance on the
OSM
20 matches
Mail list logo