Re: [Tagging] using Michelin's road classification (was: Routing in Liège)

2016-09-17 Thread Richard Fairhurst
André Pirard wrote: > Last point is what source:???=Michelin ??? to use to prevent a > StijnRR or like arbitrarily destructing well thought out tagging > without notifying the author. I suggest > source:highway=https://viamichelin.be/web/Cartes-plans 2016 2016. No, you must not copy from

Re: [Tagging] using Michelin's road classification (was: Routing in Liège)

2016-09-17 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 16 set 2016, alle ore 21:51, André Pirard > ha scritto: > > At very first (short) sight, I am surprised that Martin did not spot that the > ref=N3 road that's going north-west is primary (in red) mostly but is > interrupted by

[Tagging] using Michelin's road classification (was: Routing in Liège)

2016-09-16 Thread André Pirard
Hi Marc, Could you please forward/translate this reply to Michael and anyone who believe that Liège (and other places?) contain main road classification errors that produce bad routing. One-way streets and the like will be another subject. I suggested below to compare the OSM classification with

Re: [Tagging] using Michelin's road classification (was: Routing in Liège)

2016-09-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-09-15 17:02 GMT+02:00 André Pirard : > Please note that when a street is promoted to tertiary status, the fact > that it contains houses gets disregarded > (and hence I wonder if it's a good idea to consider houses for road > classification rather than using an

[Tagging] using Michelin's road classification (was: Routing in Liège)

2016-09-15 Thread André Pirard
On 2016-09-13 18:21, Marc Gemis wrote: > Hallo, > > I was contacted by a mapper from Germany with whom I worked on turn:lanes. > He has to following question, can someone with local knowledge inform > us about the road classifications ? I have the impression a lot of > streets are indeed