On 07/10/2010 01:03, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
On 2010-10-06 at 21:20:08 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
Some places but not all...At least in NL you are not allowed to turn
left or make a U-turn across a solid centre line, nor are you allowed to
cross the line to overtake anything at all.
It's
On 2010-10-07 at 08:16:46 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
On 07/10/2010 01:03, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
On 2010-10-06 at 21:20:08 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
It's the same in Italy, but you can overtake if you are an ambulance
or another emergency vehicle, so I believe it is worth to keep
the
I know we already talked about this, but actually no actions followed ;-)
What is the current feeling for a new key landcover? Could resolve
many issues, as often landuse is a mixture of actual use and
coverage.
Seems like there is already landcover=tree in the database:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I know we already talked about this, but actually no actions followed ;-)
What is the current feeling for a new key landcover? Could resolve
many issues, as often landuse is a mixture of actual use and
coverage.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com wrote:
In general, I like the idea. But I don't think the agricultural tags should
be changed from landuse--they describe how the land is used. For example,
forest describes what covers the land (trees), while orchard
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Brad Neuhauser brad.neuhau...@gmail.com
wrote:
In general, I like the idea. But I don't think the agricultural tags should
be changed from landuse--they describe how the land is used.
I'd forgotten about that--good point. Although surface as currently used
seems to be mainly in the context of roads.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Could this not be collapsed into with surface=*? If not, what would be
the relationship/difference
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
Not everything in a national forest is covered by trees, yet the
standard way of tagging one is landuse=forest on an area.
some tag it like this but this is entirely wrong.
National forest defines the ownership but
On 07/10/2010 19:56, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Brad Neuhauser wrote:
I'd forgotten about that--good point. Although surface as currently
used seems to be mainly in the context of roads.
There's nothing to limit it to roads - it describes the surface of a
feature. For example, the natural=beach
Hi Sam,
Seems like some great work. I'm relatively new to contributing to OSM so
pardon what may be some ignorant questions that I have.
1. How does the spreadsheet fit in with the current process of managing Map
Features (RFC Draft, Proposal, Vote, etc)?
2. How will new users to OSM find this
cool thanks :)
I guess it makes the most sence for me to update the wiki page, i'll
try my best to answer you questions to make it easier for others who
see the page, and might have the same questions.
I'll aim to get it done by 1 weeks tim
cheers,
sam
On 10/7/10, Sean Horgan
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not everything in a national forest is covered by trees, yet the
standard way of tagging one is landuse=forest on an area.
some tag it
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Brad Neuhauser wrote:
I'd forgotten about that--good point. Although surface as currently
used seems to be mainly in the context of roads.
There's nothing to limit it to roads - it describes the surface of a
On 10/07/2010 10:22 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
That's why it's landuse=forest, not landcover=forest. A
landuse=residential area isn't all houses (it includes yards,
That's why it is not landuse=house. A landuse=residential contains all
things that belong to a typical residential area, like
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Ralf Kleineisel r...@kleineisel.de wrote:
I know that legally a field may belong to a national forest, but it
shouldn't be tagged as a forest because it isn't one.
It is a part of a managed forest.
Every topographic
or street map I know would show a border of a
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why it's landuse=forest, not landcover=forest. A
landuse=residential area isn't all houses (it includes yards,
driveways, garages, streets, sidewalks) and a landuse=forest area
isn't all trees.
still it
On 8 October 2010 03:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the current feeling for a new key landcover? Could resolve
many issues, as often landuse is a mixture of actual use and
coverage.
As long as it is made clear that not all landuse= tags are actually
landuse (or
17 matches
Mail list logo
