This was a expected answer. I frequently try to discover the reason OSM
mappers accepting this anarchistic rule of NOT having tagging rules at all.
What are the advantages for this?
- robert -
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Richard Weait
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 10:08 PM
To:
On 01/02/2011 05:42 PM, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
This was a expected answer. I frequently try to discover the reason OSM
mappers accepting this anarchistic rule of NOT having tagging rules at all.
What are the advantages for this?
I prefer this over being told what I may map and what not.
On 02/01/2011 19:24, Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
On 01/02/2011 05:42 PM, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
This was a expected answer. I frequently try to discover the reason OSM
mappers accepting this anarchistic rule of NOT having tagging rules at all.
What are the advantages for this?
I prefer this over
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ralf Kleineisel r...@kleineisel.de wrote:
On 01/02/2011 05:42 PM, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
This was a expected answer. I frequently try to discover the reason OSM
mappers accepting this anarchistic rule of NOT having tagging rules at all.
What are the advantages
Colin Smale wrote:
Anarchy will
produce WOM - Write Only Memory - whereby everybody adds their own
little bit of information using their own ontology, resulting in minimal
data quality.
We don't have an anarchy. We have an informal meritocracy, where people
influence the whole depending on
On 01/02/2011 07:52 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
On 02/01/2011 19:24, Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
I prefer this over being told what I may map and what not.
Does that not depend on whether you are working for yourself, or as a
part of a cooperative project? Do you not care whether others can use
what
On 01/02/2011 08:45 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
You seem to believe that people make up their own ontologies in
isolation. But that's observably not true. Mappers /voluntarily/ use
established tags, as long as they know them and don't fundamentally
disagree with them. For obvious reasons: They
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Ralf Kleineisel r...@kleineisel.de wrote:
I do not want someone telling me this is not relevant enough and
having the right to delete my edits.
Then make edits which are relevant enough, or pay for your own servers
to store them.
I've set up a proposal for sluice_gates, which are typically found on small
waterways in agricultural areas at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 01/01/2011 07:08 AM, Ed Hillsman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Anthony osm at inbox.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging wrote:
/ Any suggestions how to tag this?
// http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:IMG_7491.JPG/
If the lane is too narrow to function
On 01/01/2011 07:54 AM, Dave F. wrote:
Is the adjacent path shared? if so, note that that would be the safer
passage.
Most states prohibit bicycles from sidewalks, or limit their speed to a
walking speed on sidewalks, making them useless for bicyclists. That,
and nobody expects vehicles to be
On 01/01/2011 01:28 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Robert Elsenaar
robert-Sr3mCESyW84k+I/owrr...@public.gmane.org wrote:
hazard:bicycle is the other way round. If there is a key/value e.g.
hazard=narrow then you can easily use cycleway:hazard=narrow to tag the
On 01/01/2011 10:52 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Greg Troxel
gdt-2FjktZCtrC/qt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org wrote:
By trying to objectively tag the reality (not entirely possible of
course), we also avoid all the debates about what is and isn't safe in
general, and where
On 3 January 2011 11:59, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I've set up a proposal for sluice_gates, which are typically found on small
waterways in agricultural areas at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sluice_gate
You might want to add an example photo for those not
On 12/31/2010 04:27 PM, Anthony wrote:
Any suggestions how to tag this?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:IMG_7491.JPG
As part of the existing way, just tag it cycleway=lane to indicate
that there's a restricted lane reserved for bicycles.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Not having a sense of depth, I'd guess in the narrow spot it's about 4
feet wide, which is, believe it or not, the federal minimum width for
bike lanes (though I wish Ray would hurry up and adopt Oregon's 6 foot
lanes and
Two feet wide is about what I had estimated by looking at the photograph, which
is why I commented that the bicycle might fit into the bike lane, but part of
the rider would have to extend over the line into the automobile lane. Your
wheels would be more-or-less atop the lane divider stripe.
17 matches
Mail list logo
