On 01/01/2011 10:52 AM, Anthony wrote: > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Greg Troxel > <gdt-2FjktZCtrC/qt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> By trying to objectively tag the reality (not entirely possible of >> course), we also avoid all the debates about what is and isn't safe in >> general, and where the dividing line is. > > In this case I'm not even sure it's physically possible for a bicycle > to fit in the supposed bicycle lane, let alone safe.
Not having a sense of depth, I'd guess in the narrow spot it's about 4 feet wide, which is, believe it or not, the federal minimum width for bike lanes (though I wish Ray would hurry up and adopt Oregon's 6 foot lanes and make them mandatory to receive highway funding...)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging