On 24/05/11 00:49, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
[...] the landuse values describing built-up space should usually not be
split below plot size.
I'll read that as another vote against small landuse plots, but again:
there's nothing in the wiki explaining this fact, and in fact landuse is
regularly
If there would be a consensus on only using landuse=* tags on bigger
surfaces (and not for single houses), the use of
residential=garden
or
garden=residential
should be possible without it being in a landuse=residential area. In
Belgium, the spatial planning is worthless and there are lots of
On 24/05/11 10:09, Sander Deryckere wrote:
[...] there are lots of
buildings (normal houses, not farms) that stand in the middle of a
farmland [...]
I do not have a strict opinion whether it should be residential=garden
or garden=residential, but as the first one sounds like a
Thanks for the feedback, everyone! I think a plan is emerging, and I've
updated
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden#Deprecate_this_for_private.2C_residential_gardens.3F
with the pros and cons of the suggested alternative schemes as I
understand them.
Right now it looks
Le 24/05/2011 10:39, Andrew Chadwick (lists) a écrit :
On 24/05/11 00:49, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
[...] the landuse values describing built-up space should usually not be
split below plot size.
I'll read that as another vote against small landuse plots, but again:
there's nothing in the
On 24/05/11 10:57, Vincent Pottier wrote:
I'd rather use the residential=garden as it may start a set of values to
describe sub-polygons in a landuse residential.
here http://osm.org/go/0CUOvbQ1-- is a suburb I would improve, there are
grass areas, parkings between buildings.
You have
On 24 May 2011 20:23, Andrew Chadwick (lists)
a.t.chadwick+li...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a need to address the meanings of overlapping
landuses or possibly even areas generally that I don't really wish to
address in something as simple as a rewording of the docs for gardens.
There's not