On 24/05/11 00:49, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > [...] the landuse values describing built-up space should usually not be > split below plot size.
I'll read that as another vote against small landuse plots, but again: there's nothing in the wiki explaining this fact, and in fact landuse is regularly used for plot-sized areas of land. > leisure=garden inside a landuse=residential area could be used for a > private garden, maybe together with access=private. You can also use > garden:type=residential with it: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Garden_specification -1, Residential private gardens are not for general user's leisure activities, and therefore no not belong in the leisure=* key. See my original post. I'm easy about whether I recommend landuse=residential residential=garden or just residential=garden within a landuse=residential polygon, or even garden=residential on its own within a landuse=residential polygon (sort of like the stalled proposal's wrongheaded :type key, but allowing the user to decide whether general leisure purposes fit as well. A leisure=garden would be strictly optional, and we should document the meaning of adding that). Which do people prefer? -- Andrew Chadwick _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging