Hi!
I've changed proposal a bit: now lanes:directions (still no good
alternative to this tag, despite long discussion in russian forum)
values are separated by commas, not semicolons: l,s,sr. This was done
because a semicolon is used to enumerate simultaneous, not consequent,
values (so
I also have a proposal running for this kind of feature:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area#area-steps
According to this proposal you'd draw at least the lower and the upper
border of the steps as ways (possibly with an equal amount of nodes
each)
Then make a relation
2011/10/10 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
I also have a proposal running for this kind of feature:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area#area-steps
Not sure how we should proceed to keep routing working.
a) Either we'd expect software that prepares OSM-data
pulled this from talk because it was OT there
2011/10/8 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/131585141 with a
creation date of 2011-09-28.
Should the entire city be tagged with landuse=residential like it currently
is?
IMHO it shouldn't. You might
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
pulled this from talk because it was OT there
2011/10/8 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/131585141 with a
creation date of 2011-09-28.
Should the entire city be tagged with
On 10/9/2011 9:10 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
From my personal experience, very few communities, even if containing only a
few residences, lack at least one retail, religious, or other non-residential
building, usually with an associated parking lot.
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/9/2011 9:10 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
From my personal experience, very few communities, even if
containing only a few residences, lack at least one retail, religious,
or other non-residential building, usually with an associated parking
