Hi all,
I'm currently entering some survey data from my summer holiday (in rural
England). Living in a city, tagging landuse=residential is
straightfoward; but in the countryside houses often have large grounds
attached to them, and even fields. In particular there are quite a few
rows of
I'd include houses' gardens in the residential land use area
associated with the houses --- if they're large rural gardens, it
helps to distinguish them from fields.
__John
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
In built-up areas, almost all land is used.
straightfoward; but in the countryside houses often have large grounds
attached to them, and even fields. In particular there are quite a few
I think the question is if the lot that the house is on (assuming lots
in England work like lots in the
As others have said, I usually tag the entire parcel, as long as it's not
used for farming. I'd somewhat like a way to tag low-density rural
residential land-use, but as it is I think the absence of a thick network
of residential streets is a decent clue that one isn't looking at a
built-up area.
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 16:11 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Yes, if animals are intended to graze on the grass, if the grass will be
harvested for use as
fodder (what my earlier message termed a hay field), or if sod will
subsequently be transplanted
elsewhere (a sod farm), then the grass
Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 16:11 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Yes, if animals are intended to graze on the grass, if the grass
will be harvested for use as
fodder (what my earlier message termed a hay field), or if sod will
subsequently be
